Tony Honoré
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Law top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter BirksNeil MacCormickJill HarriesPeter CaneDavid HowarthDavid RichardsH. L. A. HartBruce W. Frier
- Topics
- Legal principles and applications (10 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (10 papers)Classical Studies and Legal History (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tony Honoré
28 papers receiving 437 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Cognitive Neuroscience 118
- Political Science and International Relations 117
- Law 115
- Sociology and Political Science 107
- Philosophy 94
Countries citing papers authored by Tony Honoré
This map shows the geographic impact of Tony Honoré's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tony Honoré with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tony Honoré more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tony Honoré
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tony Honoré. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tony Honoré. The network helps show where Tony Honoré may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tony Honoré
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tony Honoré. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tony Honoré based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tony Honoré. Tony Honoré is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | La causalidad en el derecho | 2 |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Relating to Responsibility Essays for Tony Honoré on His Eightieth Birthday | 2 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical | 20 |
| 14 | The Legal Mind: Essays for Tony Honore | 11 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | Causation in the Lawbreakdown → | 293 |
| 17 | Family, things, and succession | 2 |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | The quest for security: Employees, tenants, wives | 6 |
| 20 | The South African law of trusts | 0 |
About Tony Honoré
Tony Honoré is a scholar working on Law, Classics and Anthropology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (10 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (10 papers) and Classical Studies and Legal History (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (115 citations), Philosophy (94 citations) and General Decision Sciences (14 citations). Tony Honoré has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Birks, Neil MacCormick, Jill Harries, Peter Cane, David Howarth, David Richards, H. L. A. Hart and Bruce W. Frier. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Philosophical Review and The Yale Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.