Mark T. Nelson
- Molecular Biology
- Materials Chemistry
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert D. SkeelLaxmikant V. KaléAndrew DalkeAttila GürsoyKlaus SchultenWilliam HumphreyPaul K. MoserRobert Almeder
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers)
- Journals
- Computer Physics CommunicationsThe Philosophical QuarterlyPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark T. Nelson
22 papers receiving 512 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Molecular Biology 280
- Materials Chemistry 79
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 71
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 54
- Philosophy 53
Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Nelson
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Nelson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Nelson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Nelson. The network helps show where Mark T. Nelson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark T. Nelson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark T. Nelson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark T. Nelson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark T. Nelson. Mark T. Nelson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Christian theism and moral philosophy | 2 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 420 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Mark T. Nelson
Mark T. Nelson is a scholar working on Philosophy, Family Practice and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (53 citations), Molecular Biology (280 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (25 citations). Mark T. Nelson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Skeel, Laxmikant V. Kalé, Andrew Dalke, Attila Gürsoy, Klaus Schulten, William Humphrey, Paul K. Moser, Robert Almeder, Surjit B. Dixit and J. C. Phillips. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Physics Communications, The Philosophical Quarterly and Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.