Rita Champaneria
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 7
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 3
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 14
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 3
- Internal Medicine top 5%
-
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments 7
-
- Menstrual Health and Disorders 5
- Pregnancy-related medical research 3
-
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 3
- Co-authors
- Jane DanielsKhalid S. KhanLee MiddletonPallavi LattheSiladitya BhattacharyaKevin CooperJanesh GuptaLaila Shah
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (7 papers)International Urogynecology Journal (4 papers)Health Technology Assessment (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomArgentinaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Rita Champaneria
35 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 518
- Reproductive Medicine 549
- Internal Medicine 117
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 90
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 74
Countries citing papers authored by Rita Champaneria
This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Champaneria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Champaneria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Champaneria more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Champaneria
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Champaneria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Champaneria. The network helps show where Rita Champaneria may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rita Champaneria, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 6 | Refining Ovarian Cancer Test accuracy Scores (ROCkeTS) trial update | 2016 | 1 |
| 7 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 62 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 84 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 79 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 145 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 100 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 7 |
About Rita Champaneria
Rita Champaneria is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Internal Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (14 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (7 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (7 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (5 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (3 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (3 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (518 citations), Reproductive Medicine (549 citations) and Internal Medicine (117 citations). Rita Champaneria has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Argentina and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Jane Daniels, Khalid S. Khan, Lee Middleton, Pallavi Latthe, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Kevin Cooper, Janesh Gupta, Laila Shah, Moji Balogun and Parveen Abedin. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, International Urogynecology Journal, Health Technology Assessment, BMJ Open and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.