Peter O’Donovan

66 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Peter O’Donovan
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 557
  • Reproductive Medicine 400
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 137
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 369
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 464
Replace Di Wu with:
Di Wu China
Ayşe Bener Canada
Liping Chen China
Mario G. C. A. Cimino Italy
Mukesh Singhal United States
Elena Casiraghi Italy
Saima Sadiq Pakistan
Yilun Lin China
David Gunning United States
Peter O’Donovan relative to Di Wu China Di Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×55.7×
Di Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter O’Donovan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter O’Donovan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter O’Donovan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter O’Donovan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter O’Donovan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter O’Donovan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter O’Donovan. The network helps show where Peter O’Donovan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter O’Donovan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter O’Donovan Line = papers co-authored together Peter O’Donovan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015205
2 2015136
3 2014122
4 2011117
5 2011114
6 2015106
7 2018103
8 2010100
9 201599
10 201987
11 201487
12 201184
13 201682
14 200653
15 201452
16 201948
17 201845
18 201139
19 201136
20 201835

About Peter O’Donovan

Peter O’Donovan is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Health Informatics and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (21 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (16 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (15 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (6 papers), Digital Transformation in Industry (6 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (6 papers), Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques (5 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (557 citations), Reproductive Medicine (400 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (137 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (369 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (464 citations). Peter O’Donovan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Aaron Hertzmann, Dominic O’Sullivan, Aseem Agarwala, Ken Bruton, Kevin Leahy, Colm Gallagher, Siân Jones, Rudi Campo, Rudy Leon De Wilde and Shagaf Bakour. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026