Jane Daniels

14.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
143 papers, 8.4k citations indexed

About

Jane Daniels is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Daniels has authored 143 papers receiving a total of 8.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 57 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 33 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Daniels's work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (54 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (40 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (24 papers). Jane Daniels is often cited by papers focused on Endometriosis Research and Treatment (54 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (40 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (24 papers). Jane Daniels collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Jane Daniels's co-authors include Özge Tunçalp, Ann‐Beth Moller, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Marleen Temmerman, Leontine Alkema, Alison Gemmill, Doris Chou, Lale Say, Khalid S. Khan and Lee Middleton and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.

In The Last Decade

Jane Daniels

134 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Hit Papers

Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis 2010 2026 2015 2020 2014 2010 2015 1000 2.0k 3.0k 4.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Daniels United Kingdom 35 3.8k 3.5k 1.6k 1.2k 1.0k 143 8.4k
Olof Stephansson Sweden 58 4.2k 1.1× 4.6k 1.3× 3.8k 2.4× 741 0.6× 2.1k 2.0× 272 11.2k
Petra Otterblad Olausson Sweden 35 2.3k 0.6× 905 0.3× 1.9k 1.2× 504 0.4× 1.3k 1.3× 64 8.5k
Maura K. Whiteman United States 38 2.0k 0.5× 2.2k 0.6× 2.9k 1.8× 1.1k 0.9× 737 0.7× 123 6.8k
Erwin Birnie Netherlands 41 1.1k 0.3× 1.6k 0.4× 725 0.5× 1.2k 1.0× 604 0.6× 233 5.4k
Philippa Middleton Australia 55 3.7k 1.0× 2.7k 0.8× 1.9k 1.2× 136 0.1× 2.2k 2.1× 163 9.7k
Alexi A. Wright United States 45 2.7k 0.7× 765 0.2× 6.3k 3.9× 1.2k 1.0× 1.0k 1.0× 163 10.2k
Martin Neovius Sweden 54 1.5k 0.4× 1.2k 0.3× 2.5k 1.5× 143 0.1× 2.4k 2.3× 208 10.6k
M. Klee Denmark 16 2.4k 0.6× 748 0.2× 1.9k 1.2× 430 0.4× 2.9k 2.8× 23 13.9k
Arie Franx Netherlands 47 4.5k 1.2× 5.3k 1.5× 1.4k 0.9× 419 0.3× 532 0.5× 306 7.5k
Helle Kieler Sweden 41 1.6k 0.4× 1.2k 0.3× 2.4k 1.5× 498 0.4× 659 0.6× 181 5.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Daniels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Daniels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Daniels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Daniels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Daniels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Daniels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Daniels. The network helps show where Jane Daniels may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Daniels

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Daniels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Daniels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Daniels. Jane Daniels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Whitaker, Lucy, Linda Williams, Frances Collins, et al.. (2025). Dichloroacetate for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain (EPiC1): a single-arm feasibility study. Edinburgh Research Explorer. 1(3). e189–e197.
2.
Morton, Victoria Hodgetts, Catherine A Moakes, Jane Daniels, et al.. (2024). Cerclage suture type to prevent pregnancy loss in women requiring a vaginal cervical cerclage: the C-STICH RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 28(40). 1–44. 1 indexed citations
4.
Krishnan, M., Brenda F. Narice, Ying Cheong, et al.. (2024). Surgery and minimally invasive treatments for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2024(6). CD015650–CD015650. 2 indexed citations
5.
García, María L., et al.. (2023). Self-collected versus health-care professional taken swab for identification of vaginal-rectal colonisation with group B streptococcus in late pregnancy: a systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 286. 95–101. 1 indexed citations
6.
Ross, Jonathan, Clare Brittain, Jocelyn Anstey Watkins, et al.. (2023). Intravaginal lactic acid gel versus oral metronidazole for treating women with recurrent bacterial vaginosis: the VITA randomised controlled trial. BMC Women s Health. 23(1). 241–241. 6 indexed citations
7.
Whitaker, Lucy, Jacqueline Stephen, John Norrie, et al.. (2021). Laparoscopic treatment of isolated superficial peritoneal endometriosis for managing chronic pelvic pain in women: study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial (ESPriT1). Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7(1). 19–19. 3 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Leslie, Philippa T. K. Saunders, Jane Daniels, et al.. (2021). Dichloroacetate as a possible treatment for endometriosis-associated pain: a single-arm open-label exploratory clinical trial (EPiC). Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7(1). 67–67. 12 indexed citations
10.
Hewitt, Catherine A, Katy Vincent, Lee Middleton, et al.. (2020). Gabapentin to reduce pain in women aged between 18 and 50 years with chronic pelvic pain: the GaPP2 RCT. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(7). 1–60. 2 indexed citations
11.
13.
Khan, Khalid S., Lee Middleton, Andrew Sutton, et al.. (2018). MRI versus laparoscopy to diagnose the main causes of chronic pelvic pain in women: a test-accuracy study and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment. 22(40). 1–92. 14 indexed citations
14.
Leighton, Lisa, et al.. (2017). Willingness of postmenopausal women to participate in a study involving local vaginal oestrogen treatment as an adjunct to pelvic organ prolapse surgery - LOTUS feasibility trial. 1 indexed citations
15.
Ewer, Andrew K, Lee Middleton, Alexandra Furmston, et al.. (2012). Pulse Oximetry Screening for Congenital Heart Defects in Newborn Infants (Pulseox). Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 67(1). 10–12. 11 indexed citations
16.
Bhattacharya, Siladitya, Lee Middleton, A Tsourapas, et al.. (2011). Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment. 15(19). iii–xvi, 1. 84 indexed citations
17.
Daniels, Jane, J. Gray, Helen Pattison, et al.. (2009). Rapid testing for group B streptococcus during labour: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness. Health Technology Assessment. 13(42). 1–154, iii. 42 indexed citations
18.
Abedin, Parveen, Jane Daniels, & Khalid S. Khan. (2007). Health technology assessment in obstetrics and gynaecology. Part 1: an overview of the process. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 9(2). 109–115. 2 indexed citations
19.
Abedin, Parveen, Jane Daniels, & Khalid S. Khan. (2007). Health technology assessment in obstetrics and gynaecology. Part 2: application in practice. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist. 9(3). 181–187. 2 indexed citations
20.
Allen, M. M., Jayant Murthy, Jane Daniels, et al.. (1997). UVISI Observations of the Pleiades. 190. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026