James Geoghegan
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Surgery
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jane DanielsKhalid S. KhanJanesh GuptaLaila ShahRita ChampaneriaJustin ChuT. A. JohnstonSusan Hopkins
- Topics
- Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers)Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
James Geoghegan
14 papers receiving 343 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 118
- Surgery 93
- Emergency Medicine 65
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 61
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 58
Countries citing papers authored by James Geoghegan
This map shows the geographic impact of James Geoghegan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Geoghegan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Geoghegan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Geoghegan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Geoghegan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Geoghegan. The network helps show where James Geoghegan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Geoghegan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Geoghegan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Geoghegan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Geoghegan. James Geoghegan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 62 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | Developing an early pregnancy assessment unit. | 4 |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | Barbiturate poisoning treated with modified electrotherapy. | 1 |
About James Geoghegan
James Geoghegan is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and fetal healthcare (6 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (58 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (61 citations) and Biochemistry (45 citations). James Geoghegan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Daniels, Khalid S. Khan, Janesh Gupta, Laila Shah, Rita Champaneria, Justin Chu, T. A. Johnston, Susan Hopkins, P. Aiden McCormick and Colm Bergin. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and PLoS Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.