Sudha Sundar

9.7k total citations
103 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Sudha Sundar is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Sudha Sundar has authored 103 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 57 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 39 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 25 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Sudha Sundar's work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (54 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (35 papers) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (18 papers). Sudha Sundar is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (54 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (35 papers) and Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (18 papers). Sudha Sundar collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Sudha Sundar's co-authors include Trivadi S. Ganesan, Raji Ganesan, Sean Kehoe, Richard D Neal, Janos Balega, Keith McCarthy, Robert Gornall, T. Evans, Philippa Pearmain and A Blann and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Lancet Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Sudha Sundar

96 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sudha Sundar United Kingdom	21	686	661	373	317	243	103	1.5k
Chad A. Hamilton United States	24	556 0.8×	657 1.0×	300 0.8×	353 1.1×	335 1.4×	67	1.4k
Lobna Ouldamer France	19	671 1.0×	549 0.8×	208 0.6×	372 1.2×	144 0.6×	147	1.4k
Soon‐Beom Kang South Korea	24	821 1.2×	616 0.9×	312 0.8×	288 0.9×	239 1.0×	62	1.5k
Kristin K. Zorn United States	20	440 0.6×	662 1.0×	335 0.9×	276 0.9×	438 1.8×	59	1.4k
Jamie Lesnock United States	16	382 0.6×	317 0.5×	332 0.9×	292 0.9×	186 0.8×	52	1.2k
James J. Burke United States	17	984 1.4×	674 1.0×	242 0.6×	267 0.8×	220 0.9×	27	1.6k
Mary McCormack United Kingdom	20	723 1.1×	319 0.5×	334 0.9×	355 1.1×	217 0.9×	68	1.4k
Jacob Korach Israel	24	565 0.8×	886 1.3×	567 1.5×	222 0.7×	311 1.3×	107	1.6k
Thomas Högberg Sweden	21	939 1.4×	1.1k 1.6×	228 0.6×	372 1.2×	149 0.6×	52	1.5k
Laurence Gladieff France	24	421 0.6×	657 1.0×	752 2.0×	531 1.7×	230 0.9×	135	1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Sudha Sundar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sudha Sundar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sudha Sundar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sudha Sundar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sudha Sundar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sudha Sundar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sudha Sundar. The network helps show where Sudha Sundar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sudha Sundar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sudha Sundar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sudha Sundar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sudha Sundar. Sudha Sundar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sundar, Sudha, Ridhi Agarwal, Philip B. Mead, et al.. (2025). TRANSFORMING OVARIAN CANCER DIAGNOSTIC PATHWAYS (SONATA): ROMA VERSUS CA125 IN COMMUNITY SETTING FOR DIAGNOSIS OF OVARIAN CANCER. A REAL-WORLD PROSPECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY – PRELIMINARY RESULTS. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 35(11). 102734–102734.

Sundar, Sudha, et al.. (2025). Investigating the acceptability of cervical screening, using conventional clinician-taken cervical samples or urine self-sampling, at 6 weeks postnatal: A cross-sectional questionnaire. Journal of Medical Screening. 33(1). 48–58.

Brentnall, Adam R., Karin Denton, Lorna McWilliams, et al.. (2025). Postnatal instead of normally-timed cervical screening (PINCS-1): a protocol for a feasibility study of paired-sample cervical screening and urine self-sampling at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postnatal in the UK. BMJ Open. 15(5). e092701–e092701. 1 indexed citations

Sundar, Sudha, et al.. (2024). Steroid metabolism and hormonal dynamics in normal and malignant ovaries. Essays in Biochemistry. 68(4). 491–507. 5 indexed citations

Croft, Wayne, Kavita Singh, Janos Balega, et al.. (2024). The chromatin landscape of high-grade serous ovarian cancer metastasis identifies regulatory drivers in post-chemotherapy residual tumour cells. Communications Biology. 7(1). 1211–1211. 2 indexed citations

Boyle, William, Anthony G. Williams, Raji Ganesan, et al.. (2024). Investigating age and ethnicity as novel high-risk phenotypes in mucinous ovarian cancer: retrospective study in a multi-ethnic population. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 34(9). 1399–1407.

Cummins, Carole, Joanna Long, Vivek Arora, et al.. (2023). Analysis of Anxiety, Depression and Fear of Progression at 12 Months Post-Cytoreductive Surgery in the SOCQER-2 (Surgery in Ovarian Cancer—Quality of Life Evaluation Research) Prospective, International, Multicentre Study. Cancers. 16(1). 75–75. 3 indexed citations

Fotopoulou, Christina, Tabassum Khan, James Glasbey, et al.. (2023). Outcomes of Gynecologic Cancer Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International, Multicenter, Prospective CovidSurg–Gynecologic Oncology Cancer Study. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 78(5). 277–278. 1 indexed citations

Fotopoulou, Christina, James Glasbey, Luis Chiva, et al.. (2022). 2022-RA-1057-ESGO Outcomes of gynaecological cancer surgery during the covid-19 pandemic: results from the international, multicenter, prospective covidsurg-gynaecological cancer study. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 32. A458–A459. 2 indexed citations

10.

Cummins, Carole, Joanna Long, Janos Balega, et al.. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Ultra-Radical Surgery on Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Using Population-Based Data in a Multicentre UK Study. Cancers. 14(18). 4362–4362. 8 indexed citations

11.

Sundar, Sudha, Rebecca Bowen, Christina Fotopoulou, et al.. (2022). British Gynaecological Cancer Society Recommendations for Women With Gynecological Cancer Who Received Non-standard Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 77(3). 156–157. 1 indexed citations

12.

Rockall, Andrea, Tara Barwick, William Wilson, et al.. (2021). Diagnostic Accuracy of FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Detection of Nodal Metastases in Surgically Treated Endometrial and Cervical Carcinoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 27(23). 6457–6466. 15 indexed citations

13.

Sundar, Sudha, Carole Cummins, Joanna Long, et al.. (2021). Quality of life from cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: Investigating the association between disease burden and surgical complexity in the international, prospective, SOCQER‐2 cohort study. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 129(7). 1122–1132. 19 indexed citations

14.

Taylor, Alexandra, Sudha Sundar, Rebecca Bowen, et al.. (2021). British Gynaecological Cancer Society recommendations for women with gynecological cancer who received non-standard care during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 32(1). 9–14. 2 indexed citations

15.

Sundar, Sudha, Sunil Kumar, Junyu Long, et al.. (2020). PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (PRO) AFTER SURGERY IN ADVANCED OVARIAN CANCER - INITIAL RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL, PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER SOCQER 2 STUDY. Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London). 1 indexed citations

16.

Hirst, Yasemin, et al.. (2020). Cancer Loyalty Card Study (CLOCS): protocol for an observational case–control study focusing on the patient interval in ovarian cancer diagnosis. BMJ Open. 10(9). e037459–e037459. 9 indexed citations

17.

Phillips, Andrew, Sudha Sundar, Ahmed Elattar, et al.. (2018). Has the “paradigm shift” in the management of advanced ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer altered the locations of recurrence?. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 39(3). 365–371. 1 indexed citations

18.

Sundar, Sudha, Caroline Rick, Francis Dowling, et al.. (2016). Refining Ovarian Cancer Test accuracy Scores (ROCkeTS): protocol for a prospective longitudinal test accuracy study to validate new risk scores in women with symptoms of suspected ovarian cancer. BMJ Open. 6(8). e010333–e010333. 16 indexed citations

19.

Meads, Catherine, Peter Auguste, Clare Davenport, et al.. (2013). Positron emission tomography/computerised tomography imaging in detecting and managing recurrent cervical cancer: systematic review of evidence, elicitation of subjective probabilities and economic modelling. Health Technology Assessment. 17(12). 1–323. 44 indexed citations

20.

Sundar, Sudha, Robert Gornall, & Sean Kehoe. (2005). Advances in the management of cervical cancer. The Journal of the British Menopause Society. 11(3). 91–95. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact