Laila Shah
- Neurology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation top 1%
- Surgery
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Carl E ClarkeKeith WheatleyNatalie IvesRebecca StoweKatherine DeaneCharmaine MeekClaire L TomlinsonSmitaa Patel
- Topics
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers)Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsHealth Technology AssessmentJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsIndia
In The Last Decade
Laila Shah
10 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Neurology 777
- Psychiatry and Mental health 493
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 395
- Surgery 191
- Rehabilitation 106
Countries citing papers authored by Laila Shah
This map shows the geographic impact of Laila Shah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laila Shah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laila Shah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laila Shah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laila Shah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laila Shah. The network helps show where Laila Shah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laila Shah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laila Shah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laila Shah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laila Shah. Laila Shah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56 | |
| 2 | 80 | |
| 3 | 163 | |
| 4 | Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's diseasebreakdown → | 327 |
| 5 | 121 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 147 | |
| 9 | 144 | |
| 10 | Efficacy and acceptability of amineptine in Indian depressive patients : an open trial. | 2 |
About Laila Shah
Laila Shah is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (395 citations), Neurology (777 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (493 citations). Laila Shah has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and India. Frequent co-authors include Carl E Clarke, Keith Wheatley, Natalie Ives, Rebecca Stowe, Katherine Deane, Charmaine Meek, Claire L Tomlinson, Smitaa Patel, Catherine Sackley and Clare P Herd. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Technology Assessment and Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.