Richard W. Redman
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Research and Theory top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Emergency Medical Services top 2%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Shaké KetefianMary R. LynnHuey‐Ming TzengLauren ClarkKathleen PotempaKatherine R. JonesPatricia Hinton WalkerLingling Zhang
- Topics
- Global Health Workforce Issues (8 papers)Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaInternational Journal of Nursing StudiesClinical Journal of Pain
- Partner nations
- United StatesThailandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard W. Redman
73 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- General Health Professions 619
- Research and Theory 211
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 189
- Emergency Medical Services 180
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 177
Countries citing papers authored by Richard W. Redman
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard W. Redman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard W. Redman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard W. Redman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard W. Redman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard W. Redman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard W. Redman. The network helps show where Richard W. Redman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard W. Redman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard W. Redman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard W. Redman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard W. Redman. Richard W. Redman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 58 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | Creating a Comprehensive Faculty Development Program. | 7 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Richard W. Redman
Richard W. Redman is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and Family Practice, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Workforce Issues (8 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (211 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (94 citations) and Leadership and Management (32 citations). Richard W. Redman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shaké Ketefian, Mary R. Lynn, Huey‐Ming Tzeng, Lauren Clark, Kathleen Potempa, Katherine R. Jones, Patricia Hinton Walker, Lingling Zhang, Milisa Manojlovich and Greta L. Krapohl. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Clinical Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.