Neil Forsyth

93 total papers · 715 total citations
29 papers, 186 citations indexed

About

Neil Forsyth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil Forsyth has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 186 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Neil Forsyth's work include Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). Neil Forsyth is often cited by papers focused on Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). Neil Forsyth collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland and United Kingdom. Neil Forsyth's co-authors include Calvin S. Brown, Russell Jackson, Adela Yarbro Collins, Pamela Mason, B. McH., Carol Zaleski, Oliver Marchart, H. G. M. Williamson, John K. Hale and Dominic J. O’Meara and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Inquiry, Poetics Today and Comparative Literature.

In The Last Decade

Neil Forsyth

17 papers receiving 98 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Neil Forsyth 55 49 38 37 33 29 186
Joseph Wittreich 89 1.6× 43 0.9× 41 1.1× 36 1.0× 33 1.0× 32 206
Patrick Henry 38 0.7× 47 1.0× 62 1.6× 21 0.6× 16 0.5× 27 170
Eric Sterling 63 1.1× 89 1.8× 48 1.3× 32 0.9× 10 0.3× 23 224
Paul J. Korshin 59 1.1× 99 2.0× 66 1.7× 45 1.2× 86 2.6× 25 286
María Rosa Menocal 65 1.2× 51 1.0× 67 1.8× 16 0.4× 34 1.0× 42 237
Jane Chance 80 1.5× 38 0.8× 39 1.0× 24 0.6× 38 1.2× 25 200
Heather Dubrow 98 1.8× 31 0.6× 37 1.0× 19 0.5× 13 0.4× 34 194
Jean H. Hagstrum 98 1.8× 44 0.9× 50 1.3× 15 0.4× 16 0.5× 24 238
Bruce A. Rosenberg 64 1.2× 49 1.0× 37 1.0× 22 0.6× 19 0.6× 36 220
Elizabeth Sauer 57 1.0× 48 1.0× 74 1.9× 33 0.9× 12 0.4× 32 187

Countries citing papers authored by Neil Forsyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Forsyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Forsyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Forsyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Forsyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Forsyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Forsyth. The network helps show where Neil Forsyth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Forsyth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Forsyth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Forsyth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Forsyth. Neil Forsyth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026