Countries where authors publish in Literature Compass
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Literature Compass. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Literature Compass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Literature Compass more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Literature Compass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Literature Compass.
About Literature Compass
The 879 papers published in Literature Compass in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Literature Compass usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (448 papers), Classics (110 papers) and History (298 papers) specifically the topics of Literature: history, themes, analysis (115 papers), Medieval Literature and History (93 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (74 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (67 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (59 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (56 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (52 papers) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (48 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Literature Compass are Geraldine Heng, Tobias Boes, Hans Walter Gabler, Ian Gadd, Kellie Robertson, Jan Alber, Regenia Gagnier, Laura Doyle, Peter C. Herman and Lyn Pykett.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.