David Christensen
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 13
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
- Philosophy 27
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 27
David Christensen
32 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Philosophy 1.8k
- History and Philosophy of Science 548
- General Decision Sciences 108
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 753
- Cognitive Neuroscience 758
Countries citing papers authored by David Christensen
This map shows the geographic impact of David Christensen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Christensen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Christensen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Christensen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Christensen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Christensen. The network helps show where David Christensen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside David Christensen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 3 | On Acting as Judge in One’s Own (Epistemic) Case | 2018 | 4 |
| 4 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 119 | |
| 6 | Disagreement, Question-Begging, and Epistemic Self-Criticism | 2011 | 129 |
| 7 | 2010 | 202 | |
| 8 | Does murphy’s law apply in epistemology? | 2007 | 15 |
| 9 | Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 423 |
| 10 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 228 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 20 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 50 | |
| 16 | 1995 | 18 | |
| 17 | Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 309 |
| 18 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 32 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 112 |
About David Christensen
David Christensen is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (27 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.8k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (548 citations), General Decision Sciences (108 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (753 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (758 citations). David Christensen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Earman, Jennifer Lackey, Hilary� Kornblith and Robert Nozick. Their work appears in journals such as Noûs, The Philosophical Review, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy of Science and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.