Richard Harris
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Plant Science
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steve BaronKim HarrisAndy HectorMichael Scherer‐LorenzenJ. S. PereiraJohn H. LawtonPanayiotis G. DimitrakopoulosChrista P. H. Mulder
- Topics
- Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers)Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (3 papers)Service and Product Innovation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard Harris
10 papers receiving 545 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 208
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 180
- Marketing 156
- Plant Science 135
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 135
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Harris
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Harris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Harris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Harris more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Harris
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Harris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Harris. The network helps show where Richard Harris may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Harris
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Harris. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Harris based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Harris. Richard Harris is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | The beauty of Korean food: with 100 best-loved recipes : the research and development project for the standardization of Korean cuisine | 1 |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | 369 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 |
About Richard Harris
Richard Harris is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Marketing and General Decision Sciences, having authored 11 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (3 papers) and Service and Product Innovation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (74 citations), Marketing (156 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (208 citations). Richard Harris has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Steve Baron, Kim Harris, Andy Hector, Michael Scherer‐Lorenzen, J. S. Pereira, John H. Lawton, Panayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos, Christa P. H. Mulder, A. C. Terry and Bernhard Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Ecology Letters and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.