Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The constraints of a ‘work–life balance’ approach: an international perspective
2007320 citationsSuzan Lewis, Richenda Gambles et al.The International Journal of Human Resource Managementprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Rhona Rapoport Rhona Rapoport (= 1×)
peers
Stephen R. Marks
Countries citing papers authored by Rhona Rapoport
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Rhona Rapoport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhona Rapoport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhona Rapoport more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rhona Rapoport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rhona Rapoport. The network helps show where Rhona Rapoport may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rhona Rapoport
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rhona Rapoport.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rhona Rapoport based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Rhona Rapoport. Rhona Rapoport is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lewis, Suzan, Richenda Gambles, & Rhona Rapoport. (2007). The constraints of a ‘work–life balance’ approach: an international perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 18(3). 360–373.320 indexed citations breakdown →
Lewis, Suzan, Richenda Gambles, & Rhona Rapoport. (2006). The Myth of Work-Life Balance: The Challenge of Our Time for Men, Women and Societies. Medical Entomology and Zoology.104 indexed citations
4.
Rapoport, Rhona, et al.. (1981). Leisure provision and people's needs.22 indexed citations
5.
Rapoport, Rhona, et al.. (1980). Fathers, mothers, and society: Perspectives on parenting.5 indexed citations
6.
Rapoport, Rhona & Robert N. Rapoport. (1980). Growing Through Life. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
Rapoport, Rhona, et al.. (1977). Fathers, mothers, and others: Towards new alliances. Medical Entomology and Zoology.10 indexed citations
11.
Giele, Janet Zollinger, Rhona Rapoport, & Robert N. Rapoport. (1976). Leisure and the Family Life Cycle.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 5(6). 769–769.216 indexed citations
12.
Rapoport, Rhona & Robert N. Rapoport. (1975). Men, Women, and Equity. The Family Coordinator. 24(4). 421–421.22 indexed citations
13.
Hunt, Janet G., Rhona Rapoport, & Robert N. Rapoport. (1973). Dual-Career Families.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 2(6). 635–635.173 indexed citations
14.
Fogarty, Michael P., Rhona Rapoport, & Robert N. Rapoport. (1971). Sex, career and family: Including an international review of women's roles. Medical Entomology and Zoology.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.