Michael P. Fogarty

34 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Michael P. Fogarty
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Economics and Econometrics 95
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 81
  • Clinical Psychology 77
  • General Health Professions 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 57
Replace Ellen Jane Hollingsworth with:
Ellen Jane Hollingsworth United States
Joan Brockman Canada
Stewart E. Perry United States
Isik Aytac Türkiye
David Gordon United States
Javier Olivera Luxembourg
Anna Lukemeyer United States
Michael J. Salamon United States
Clarissa White United States
Frank Field United Kingdom
Michael P. Fogarty relative to Ellen Jane Hollingsworth United States Ellen Jane Hollingsworth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ellen Jane Hollingsworth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael P. Fogarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael P. Fogarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael P. Fogarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael P. Fogarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael P. Fogarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael P. Fogarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael P. Fogarty. The network helps show where Michael P. Fogarty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael P. Fogarty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael P. Fogarty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael P. Fogarty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael P. Fogarty. Michael P. Fogarty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 80
3 2
4
Trade Unions & British Industrial Development
5
5 1
6
Retirement policy: The next fifty years
17
7 1
8 6
9
Sex, career and family: Including an international review of women's roles
9
10
We Can Stop Rising Prices
2
11
A Companies Act 1970
1
12
Company and corporation-one law?
6
13 2
14 0
15 1
16 12
17 3
18
Co-responsibility in industry : social justice in labour-management relations
2
19 10
20 1

About Michael P. Fogarty

Michael P. Fogarty is a scholar working on Public Administration, Accounting and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 43 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (81 citations), Clinical Psychology (77 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (95 citations). Michael P. Fogarty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, India and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Yellowlees, Morton Paglin, David Harris, Rhona Rapoport, Robert N. Rapoport, Douglas H. Brooks, Daniel Aaronson, Scott A. Brave, R. Andrew Butters and Isobel Allen. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Journal of Marriage and the Family and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026