Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Guttman Health Scale for the Aged
19661.0k citationsIrving Rosow, Naomi BreslauJournal of Gerontologyprofile →
Social Integration of the Aged.
1968369 citationsDonald L. Spence, Irving RosowAmerican Sociological Reviewprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Irving Rosow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irving Rosow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irving Rosow more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irving Rosow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irving Rosow. The network helps show where Irving Rosow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irving Rosow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irving Rosow.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irving Rosow based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Irving Rosow. Irving Rosow is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.