Renee M. Cloutier
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Pharmacology
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Heidemarie BlumenthalNathan T. KearnsAshley N. Linden‐CarmichaelBrian H. CalhounLindsay S. HamDaniel J. TaylorEllen W. Leen‐FeldnerAmy K. Bacon
- Topics
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBehaviour Research and TherapyPsychological Assessment
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaJapan
In The Last Decade
Renee M. Cloutier
42 papers receiving 305 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 154
- Epidemiology 105
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 78
- Pharmacology 63
- Applied Psychology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Renee M. Cloutier
This map shows the geographic impact of Renee M. Cloutier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renee M. Cloutier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renee M. Cloutier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Renee M. Cloutier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renee M. Cloutier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renee M. Cloutier. The network helps show where Renee M. Cloutier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Renee M. Cloutier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Renee M. Cloutier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Renee M. Cloutier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Renee M. Cloutier. Renee M. Cloutier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | Typologie de L’insertion Professionnelle des Personnes Diplomees de L’Universite | 2 |
About Renee M. Cloutier
Renee M. Cloutier is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (18 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (46 citations), Clinical Psychology (154 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (78 citations). Renee M. Cloutier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Heidemarie Blumenthal, Nathan T. Kearns, Ashley N. Linden‐Carmichael, Brian H. Calhoun, Lindsay S. Ham, Daniel J. Taylor, Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner, Amy K. Bacon, Byron L. Zamboanga and Sarah A. Bilsky. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Psychological Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.