Natalia Van Doren
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Pharmacology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Stephanie T. LanzaAshley N. Linden‐CarmichaelJames A. PiazzaIris B. MaussBrett Q. FordCasey L. BrownRobert W. LevensonNur Hani Zainal
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Natalia Van Doren
22 papers receiving 289 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Clinical Psychology 100
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 99
- Epidemiology 96
- Pharmacology 71
- Social Psychology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Van Doren
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Van Doren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Van Doren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Van Doren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Van Doren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Van Doren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Van Doren. The network helps show where Natalia Van Doren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalia Van Doren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalia Van Doren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalia Van Doren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalia Van Doren. Natalia Van Doren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Natalia Van Doren
Natalia Van Doren is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (49 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (99 citations) and Clinical Psychology (100 citations). Natalia Van Doren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie T. Lanza, Ashley N. Linden‐Carmichael, James A. Piazza, Iris B. Mauss, Brett Q. Ford, Casey L. Brown, Robert W. Levenson, Nur Hani Zainal, Michelle G. Newman and Sheri L. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Clinical Psychology Review and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.