Nathan T. Kearns
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Epidemiology
- General Health Professions
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter BoedekerHeidemarie BlumenthalAteka A. ContractorRenee M. CloutierMark B. PowersWarren T. JacksonNicole H. WeissTimothy R. Elliott
- Topics
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (14 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (10 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationJournal of Vascular SurgeryPsychological Assessment
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIreland
In The Last Decade
Nathan T. Kearns
37 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 139
- Biomedical Engineering 70
- Epidemiology 63
- General Health Professions 52
- Rehabilitation 42
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan T. Kearns
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan T. Kearns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan T. Kearns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan T. Kearns more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan T. Kearns
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan T. Kearns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan T. Kearns. The network helps show where Nathan T. Kearns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan T. Kearns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan T. Kearns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan T. Kearns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan T. Kearns. Nathan T. Kearns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 59 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Nathan T. Kearns
Nathan T. Kearns is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Rehabilitation, having authored 40 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (14 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (10 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (139 citations), Rehabilitation (42 citations) and Applied Psychology (25 citations). Nathan T. Kearns has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Boedeker, Heidemarie Blumenthal, Ateka A. Contractor, Renee M. Cloutier, Mark B. Powers, Warren T. Jackson, Nicole H. Weiss, Timothy R. Elliott, Aliza T. Stein and Jasper A. J. Smits. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Vascular Surgery and Psychological Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.