Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Matthew T. FeldnerMichael J. ZvolenskyHeidemarie BlumenthalMarcel O. Bonn‐MillerSarah F. LewisAmit BernsteinLaura E. ReardonKimberly A. Babson
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (61 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (53 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner
91 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Clinical Psychology 1.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
- Physiology 407
- Applied Psychology 340
- Social Psychology 329
Countries citing papers authored by Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner. The network helps show where Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner. Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | 63 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 72 |
About Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner
Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (61 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (53 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.9k citations) and Applied Psychology (340 citations). Ellen W. Leen‐Feldner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Matthew T. Feldner, Michael J. Zvolensky, Heidemarie Blumenthal, Marcel O. Bonn‐Miller, Sarah F. Lewis, Amit Bernstein, Laura E. Reardon, Kimberly A. Babson, Liviu Bunaciu and Alison C. McLeish. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Clinical Psychology Review and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.