Rebekah Moles

5.4k citations
163 papers · 3.4k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 28

Rebekah Moles

156 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity6582018202620202023200400600

Peers

Rebekah Moles
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.4k
  • Family Practice 462
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 180
  • Emergency Medical Services 341
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 55
Replace Peter Glassman with:
Peter Glassman United States
Lisa Dolovich Canada
David K. Raynor United Kingdom
Mary P. Tully United Kingdom
Alison Blenkinsopp United Kingdom
Marion Slack United States
Peter Noyce United Kingdom
Parisa Aslani Australia
Ines Krass Australia
J A Cantrill United Kingdom
Rebekah Moles relative to Peter Glassman United States Peter Glassman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Peter Glassman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebekah Moles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebekah Moles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebekah Moles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebekah Moles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebekah Moles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebekah Moles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebekah Moles. The network helps show where Rebekah Moles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rebekah Moles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rebekah Moles Line = papers co-authored together Rebekah Moles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20240
4 20245
5 20242
6 20230
7 20230
8 20237
9 20234
10 20222
11 20203
12 20191
13
Pilot evaluation of an electronic game developed to teach medication history taking to pharmacy students
20192
14 201930
15 201823
16 2016179
17 201416
18 20143
19 2013114
20 201265

About Rebekah Moles

Rebekah Moles is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice and Medical Terminology, having authored 163 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (87 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (28 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (20 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (18 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (17 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (17 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (16 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (1.4k citations), Family Practice (462 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (180 citations). Rebekah Moles has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Timothy F. Chen, Enas Almanasreh, Betty Chaar, Jonathan Penm, Ben Basger, Mohammed A. Mohammed, Sarira El‐Den, Claire L. O’Reilly, Abilio C. de Almeida Neto and Stephen Carter. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026