Jonathan Penm

2.7k total citations
138 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Jonathan Penm is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Penm has authored 138 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 59 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 53 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 34 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Penm's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (53 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (43 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (34 papers). Jonathan Penm is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (53 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (43 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (34 papers). Jonathan Penm collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Jonathan Penm's co-authors include Betty Chaar, Rebekah Moles, Asad E. Patanwala, Neil J. MacKinnon, Sujita W. Narayan, Lachlan Oldfield, Erin L. Winstanley, Ana L. Hincapie, Danijela Gnjidic and Yan Li and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Penm

126 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Penm Australia 22 573 550 295 260 234 138 1.7k
Teryl K. Nuckols United States 25 444 0.8× 343 0.6× 399 1.4× 298 1.1× 210 0.9× 115 2.1k
Mark Bounthavong United States 22 501 0.9× 362 0.7× 512 1.7× 206 0.8× 99 0.4× 94 1.8k
Kenneth A. Lawson United States 28 418 0.7× 326 0.6× 343 1.2× 288 1.1× 85 0.4× 119 2.9k
Marc Afilalo Canada 25 216 0.4× 383 0.7× 570 1.9× 492 1.9× 238 1.0× 80 2.6k
Kylie A. Williams Australia 20 341 0.6× 627 1.1× 737 2.5× 180 0.7× 97 0.4× 71 2.1k
Nancy Winslade Canada 22 517 0.9× 586 1.1× 389 1.3× 247 0.9× 58 0.2× 40 1.8k
Ellen Schafheutle United Kingdom 20 431 0.8× 641 1.2× 718 2.4× 242 0.9× 107 0.5× 140 1.7k
Dima M. Qato United States 26 570 1.0× 855 1.6× 573 1.9× 597 2.3× 54 0.2× 89 3.3k
Vibhu Paudyal United Kingdom 27 288 0.5× 596 1.1× 909 3.1× 202 0.8× 81 0.3× 142 2.2k
Lre Bereznicki Australia 27 154 0.3× 728 1.3× 326 1.1× 327 1.3× 77 0.3× 153 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Penm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Penm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Penm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Penm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Penm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Penm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Penm. The network helps show where Jonathan Penm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Penm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Penm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Penm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Penm. Jonathan Penm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Ritchie, Angus, et al.. (2024). A tale of 2 digital hospitals: A qualitative study of antimicrobial stewardship teams. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 90(4). 1152–1161. 4 indexed citations
3.
Harris, Ian A., Adriane M. Lewin, Rajat Mittal, et al.. (2024). Does preoperative opioid use predict outcomes to 6 months following primary unilateral knee or hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? A data-linked retrospective study. Arthroplasty. 6(1). 11–11. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bero, Lisa, Fiona Blyth, Jason N. Doctor, et al.. (2023). Clinical practice guideline for deprescribing opioid analgesics: summary of recommendations. The Medical Journal of Australia. 219(2). 80–89. 25 indexed citations
5.
Penm, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Drug-Related Readmissions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Drugs & Aging. 41(1). 1–11. 13 indexed citations
6.
Quach, Duc Trong, Asad E. Patanwala, Justine Naylor, et al.. (2023). Risks and benefits of oral modified‐release compared with oral immediate‐release opioid use after surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Anaesthesia. 78(10). 1225–1236. 6 indexed citations
7.
Penm, Jonathan, et al.. (2023). Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Buprenorphine for Acute Postoperative Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Pain. 24(11). 1905–1914. 3 indexed citations
8.
Poon, Simon, et al.. (2023). The Impact of an Electronic Medication Management System on Medication Deviations on Admission and Discharge from Hospital. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(3). 1879–1879. 6 indexed citations
9.
Penm, Jonathan, et al.. (2022). The impact of digital interventions on antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: a qualitative synthesis of systematic reviews. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 77(7). 1828–1837. 28 indexed citations
10.
Baldoni, André Oliveira, et al.. (2022). Perception of pharmacists regarding human resources, training, and development of a national hospital pharmacy: a preliminary report on Basel Statements. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 58. 2 indexed citations
12.
Lee, Teresa, et al.. (2021). Attitudes, barriers and facilitators of hospital pharmacists conducting practice‐based research: a systematic review. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research. 51(3). 192–202. 11 indexed citations
14.
Penm, Jonathan, et al.. (2020). Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Factors Influencing the Use of Take-Home-Naloxone. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(4). 232–232. 13 indexed citations
15.
Nguyen, Jessica, et al.. (2019). Impact of a pharmacy technician on clinical pharmacy services in an Australian hospital. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 41(2). 445–451. 10 indexed citations
16.
Gnjidic, Danijela, et al.. (2019). Effectiveness of interventions on the appropriate use of opioids for noncancer pain among hospital inpatients: A systematic review. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 86(2). 210–243. 15 indexed citations
17.
Baldoni, André Oliveira, et al.. (2019). Hospital pharmacy practice and medication errors in Brazil. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 28(3). 168–169. 1 indexed citations
18.
Kuan, Kevin K. Y., et al.. (2019). Understanding Health Information Technology Assimilation at Individual Level: the Case of Electronic Medication Management System.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 4 indexed citations
19.
Poon, Simon, et al.. (2019). The Digitization of the ICU: An Evaluation of Usability and Hospital-Wide Acceptability. Studies in health technology and informatics. 264. 566–570. 1 indexed citations
20.
Penm, Jonathan, et al.. (2013). Educational interventions to improve prescribing competency: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 3(8). e003291–e003291. 114 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026