Rebecca Whiting

19 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Rebecca Whiting
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Sociology and Political Science 118
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 60
  • Demography 40
  • Social Psychology 32
  • General Health Professions 30
Replace Tonya Williams Bradford with:
Tonya Williams Bradford United States
Ayşe Collıns Türkiye
Michelle F. Weinberger United States
Stefanos Nachmias United Kingdom
James M. Wilkerson United States
Aimee Dinnín Huff United States
Helen Delaney New Zealand
Hasan Hüseyin UZUNBACAK Kazakhstan
Johan Edelheim Australia
Judy Davis United States
Rebecca Whiting relative to Tonya Williams Bradford United States Tonya Williams Bradford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Tonya Williams Bradford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Whiting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Whiting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Whiting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Whiting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Whiting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Whiting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Whiting. The network helps show where Rebecca Whiting may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Whiting

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Whiting. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Whiting based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Whiting. Rebecca Whiting is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 6
3 0
4 2
5 36
6
The Implications of Digital Technologies for Meaningful Work
1
7 8
8 40
9 46
10 2
11 0
12
Digi-housekeeping: a new form of digital labour?
3
13 14
14
Beyond work and life: constructing new domains in the digital age
1
15
Transitions across work-life boundaries in a connected world: the case of social entrepreneurs
0
16
Exploring transitions and work-life balance In the digital era
2
17 34
18
Identity work across boundaries in a digital world
1
19 22
20
Scientific status summary: microbial modeling
6

About Rebecca Whiting

Rebecca Whiting is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Museology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Economy and Work Transformation (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (60 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (4 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (29 citations). Rebecca Whiting has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gillian Symon, Katrina Pritchard, Petros Chamakiotis, Helen Roby and Kate Mackenzie Davey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Management Studies, Organization Studies and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026