Rebecca Smith

1.2k total citations
8 papers, 245 citations indexed

About

Rebecca Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Rebecca Smith has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in Rebecca Smith's work include Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers) and Multiferroics and related materials (2 papers). Rebecca Smith is often cited by papers focused on Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (2 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 papers) and Multiferroics and related materials (2 papers). Rebecca Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Puerto Rico. Rebecca Smith's co-authors include Peter Trower, Dave Dagnan, Martine B. Powell, Jarrad A. G. Lum, Stefanie J. Sharman, Carolyn H. Hughes‐Scholes, Lisa Reyes Mason, Stephen Lee, Finlay D. Morrison and Elzbieta Gradauskaite and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Rebecca Smith

8 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rebecca Smith United Kingdom 7 109 72 66 47 42 8 245
Dong Yul Lee Canada 12 141 1.3× 150 2.1× 23 0.3× 36 0.8× 18 0.4× 42 350
Graham Music United Kingdom 9 169 1.6× 62 0.9× 37 0.6× 45 1.0× 30 0.7× 38 276
Melissa Barry United States 7 104 1.0× 61 0.8× 55 0.8× 22 0.5× 23 0.5× 11 335
Ioannis Agaliotis Greece 10 127 1.2× 74 1.0× 70 1.1× 87 1.9× 34 0.8× 21 365
Waganesh A. Zeleke United States 9 171 1.6× 38 0.5× 141 2.1× 29 0.6× 39 0.9× 25 285
Jenna Elgin United States 7 135 1.2× 119 1.7× 57 0.9× 23 0.5× 26 0.6× 7 283
Caroline Everington United States 9 193 1.8× 108 1.5× 60 0.9× 32 0.7× 32 0.8× 19 308
Deborah Goldfarb United States 9 149 1.4× 75 1.0× 73 1.1× 69 1.5× 26 0.6× 36 271
Angeleque Akin‐Little United States 12 195 1.8× 86 1.2× 58 0.9× 156 3.3× 33 0.8× 27 432

Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Smith. The network helps show where Rebecca Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Smith. Rebecca Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Smith, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). Native prey, not landscape change or novel prey, drive cougar (Puma concolor) distribution at a boreal forest range edge. Ecology and Evolution. 14(4). e11146–e11146. 1 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Rebecca, et al.. (2023). Wildfires and Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Impacts, Risks, and Interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(13). 6252–6252. 14 indexed citations
3.
Pradhan, Dhiren K., Ajay K. Mishra, Shalini Kumari, et al.. (2019). Studies of Multiferroic Palladium Perovskites. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 1685–1685. 9 indexed citations
4.
Szimba, Eckhard, et al.. (2018). HIGH-TOOL – a strategic assessment tool for evaluating EU transport policies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 7 indexed citations
5.
Gradauskaite, Elzbieta, Jonathan Gardner, Rebecca Smith, et al.. (2017). Lead palladium titanate: A room-temperature multiferroic. Physical review. B.. 96(10). 20 indexed citations
6.
Powell, Martine B., Carolyn H. Hughes‐Scholes, Rebecca Smith, & Stefanie J. Sharman. (2012). The relationship between investigative interviewing experience and open-ended question usage. Police Practice and Research. 15(4). 283–292. 30 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Rebecca, Martine B. Powell, & Jarrad A. G. Lum. (2008). The relationship between job status, interviewing experience, gender, and police officers' adherence to open‐ended questions. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 14(1). 51–63. 53 indexed citations
8.
Dagnan, Dave, Peter Trower, & Rebecca Smith. (1998). Care staff responses to people with learning disabilities and challenging behaviour: A cognitive—emotional analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 37(1). 59–68. 111 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026