Ray Sin
About
In The Last Decade
Ray Sin
6 papers receiving 285 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Sociology and Political Science 206
- Gender Studies 171
- Demography 35
- General Health Professions 31
- Political Science and International Relations 30
Countries citing papers authored by Ray Sin
This map shows the geographic impact of Ray Sin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray Sin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray Sin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ray Sin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray Sin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray Sin. The network helps show where Ray Sin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ray Sin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ray Sin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ray Sin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ray Sin. Ray Sin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 through 2016 breakdown → | 216 |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 10 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.