Ronald Polansky
- Philosophy top 2%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 11
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 2
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 1
- Anthropology top 10%
- Classical Antiquity Studies 3
- Archeology top 10%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 6
-
- Ethics in medical practice 2
-
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 1
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 1
- Co-authors
- David SedleyMark G. Kuczewski
- Journals
- Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy (2 papers)Ancient Philosophy (2 papers)Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ronald Polansky
18 papers receiving 123 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Philosophy 107
- History and Philosophy of Science 21
- Anthropology 40
- Archeology 32
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Ronald Polansky
This map shows the geographic impact of Ronald Polansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ronald Polansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ronald Polansky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ronald Polansky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ronald Polansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ronald Polansky. The network helps show where Ronald Polansky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ronald Polansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 40 | |
| 8 | Aristotle's De Anima: A Critical Commentary | 2009 | 8 |
| 9 | 2007 | 50 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 14 | The unity of Plato's Crito | 1997 | 1 |
| 15 | 1990 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 17 | Professor Vlastos's analysis of Socratic elenchus' | 1985 | 2 |
| 18 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 20 | The dominance of Polis for Aristotle | 1979 | 1 |
About Ronald Polansky
Ronald Polansky is a scholar working on Philosophy, Archeology, Anthropology, History and Philosophy of Science and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 154 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (11 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (6 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (1 paper), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (107 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations), Anthropology (40 citations), Archeology (32 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (19 citations). Ronald Polansky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Sedley and Mark G. Kuczewski. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, Ancient Philosophy, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal, Pacific philosophical quarterly and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.