Tom van Engers

44 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Tom van Engers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Artificial Intelligence 195
  • Political Science and International Relations 124
  • Information Systems 94
  • Sociology and Political Science 41
  • Management Information Systems 36
Replace Enrico Francesconi with:
Enrico Francesconi Italy
Monica Palmirani Italy
Radboud Winkels Netherlands
Alexander Boer Netherlands
Victor Rodrı́guez-Doncel Spain
João Pedro Quintais Netherlands
Jack G. Conrad United States
Carole D. Hafner United States
T.M. van Engers Netherlands
Adam Wyner United Kingdom
Tom van Engers relative to Enrico Francesconi Italy Enrico Francesconi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Enrico Francesconi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom van Engers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom van Engers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom van Engers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom van Engers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom van Engers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom van Engers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom van Engers. The network helps show where Tom van Engers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom van Engers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom van Engers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom van Engers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom van Engers. Tom van Engers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 3
3 0
4 8
5 16
6 6
7 1
8 2
9
Using Formal Interpretations of Legal Sources for Comparing the Application of Exclusion Clauses of the UN Refugee Convention
0
10 8
11 2
12 8
13 3
14 40
15 4
16
Towards a Representational Model of Social Affordances from an Institutional Perspective
4
17
Towards a computational model for institutional scenarios
2
18 14
19
Legal simcity: Legislative maps and semantic web supporting conflict resolution
3
20
Mixing Legal and Non-legal Norms
9

About Tom van Engers

Tom van Engers is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Law and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 46 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (21 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Law (15 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (195 citations), Political Science and International Relations (124 citations) and Information Systems (94 citations). Tom van Engers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Boer, Radboud Winkels, Silvio Peroni, Fabio Vitali, Pompeu Casanovas, Monica Palmirani, Adam Wyner, Henry Prakken, Cees de Laat and Floris Bex. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Mathematics and Computation and Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026