Rachel Griffin
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Co-authors
- Amanda R. PhillipsKevin CoeFrank TuittLisa M. MartinezMaría del Carmen SalazarMary Claire Morr SerewiczN. Eugene WallsDanielle Nadorff
- Topics
- Critical Race Theory in Education (11 papers)Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChildren and Youth Services ReviewCommunication Monographs
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceRussia
In The Last Decade
Rachel Griffin
41 papers receiving 456 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Sociology and Political Science 287
- Gender Studies 146
- Education 140
- Social Psychology 113
- Communication 65
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Griffin
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Griffin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Griffin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Griffin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Griffin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Griffin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Griffin. The network helps show where Rachel Griffin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Griffin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Griffin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Griffin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Griffin. Rachel Griffin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | Teaching in the Line of Fire: Faculty of Color in the Academy. | 49 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Social focus on women and men | 6 |
About Rachel Griffin
Rachel Griffin is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Communication and Law, having authored 44 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Race Theory in Education (11 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (5 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (146 citations), Communication (65 citations) and Public Administration (25 citations). Rachel Griffin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Amanda R. Phillips, Kevin Coe, Frank Tuitt, Lisa M. Martinez, María del Carmen Salazar, Mary Claire Morr Serewicz, N. Eugene Walls, Danielle Nadorff, Jonathan P. Rossing and Pamela Samuelson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Children and Youth Services Review and Communication Monographs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.