R. J. Foley
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Computational Mechanics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- A. V. FilippenkoR. ChornockWeidong LiNathan SmithSaurabh W. JhaJ. M. SilvermanM. GaneshalingamDouglas C. Leonard
- Topics
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (163 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (68 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (67 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
R. J. Foley
162 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 5.3k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.8k
- Instrumentation 475
- Computational Mechanics 46
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 38
Countries citing papers authored by R. J. Foley
This map shows the geographic impact of R. J. Foley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. J. Foley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. J. Foley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. J. Foley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. J. Foley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. J. Foley. The network helps show where R. J. Foley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. J. Foley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. J. Foley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. J. Foley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. J. Foley. R. J. Foley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 99 | |
| 14 | LIGO/Virgo G298048: Potential optical counterpart discovered by Swope telescope | 6 |
| 15 | DISCOVERY AND COSMOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF SPT-CL J2106-5844, THE MOST MASSIVE KNOWN CLUSTER AT z > 1 | 15 |
| 16 | Spectroscopic Classifications of PSN J15053007+0138024 with Keck | 0 |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | Supernova 2007ax in NGC 2577 | 1 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | GRB 060512: Keck redshift. | 3 |
About R. J. Foley
R. J. Foley is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 185 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (163 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (68 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (67 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (5.3k citations), Instrumentation (475 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.8k citations). R. J. Foley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. V. Filippenko, R. Chornock, Weidong Li, Nathan Smith, Saurabh W. Jha, J. M. Silverman, M. Ganeshalingam, Douglas C. Leonard, J. S. Bloom and M. Modjaz. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.