Nathan Smith

18.6k total citations · 3 hit papers
236 papers, 8.3k citations indexed

About

Nathan Smith is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan Smith has authored 236 papers receiving a total of 8.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 223 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 38 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 27 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in Nathan Smith's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (137 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (135 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (96 papers). Nathan Smith is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (137 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (135 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (96 papers). Nathan Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and United Kingdom. Nathan Smith's co-authors include A. V. Filippenko, Weidong Li, R. Chornock, R. D. Gehrz, R. J. Foley, Kris Davidson, John Bally, J. M. Silverman, Jon C. Mauerhan and Jon A. Morse and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Nathan Smith

229 papers receiving 7.8k citations

Hit Papers

Nearby supernova rates from the Lick Observatory Supernov... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 2011 2025 100 200 300

Peers

Nathan Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 8.0k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.8k
  • Instrumentation 904
  • Spectroscopy 217
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 158
Replace D. J. Axon with:
D. J. Axon United Kingdom
Volker Bromm United States
Ari Laor Israel
You‐Hua Chu United States
Dean C. Hines United States
M. J. Page United Kingdom
J. J. Hester United States
Richard G. Arendt United States
D. J. Hillier United States
S. J. Smartt United Kingdom
D. J. Axon United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Nathan Smith
Nathan Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Nathan Smith
Nathan Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Smith. The network helps show where Nathan Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Smith. Nathan Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 13
2 8
3 2
4 4
5 37
6 46
7 18
8 0
9 9
10 13
11 27
12 15
13 31
14 5
15 48
16
5
17 10
18 16
19
Possible Identification of the Progenitor of SN 2016adj in NGC 5128 (Centaurus A)
0
20 41

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026