D. A. Coulter

6.2k total citations
20 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

D. A. Coulter is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, D. A. Coulter has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Instrumentation and 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in D. A. Coulter's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (15 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (9 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers). D. A. Coulter is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (15 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (9 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (5 papers). D. A. Coulter collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Denmark. D. A. Coulter's co-authors include R. J. Foley, C. D. Kilpatrick, E. Ramírez-Ruiz, Anthony L. Piro, A. Rest, Jamie A. P. Law-Smith, James Guillochon, Brenna Mockler, D. O. Jones and Y. C. Pan and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.

In The Last Decade

D. A. Coulter

19 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

D. A. Coulter
B. Marcote Netherlands
Erica Hammerstein United States
E. Aydi United States
K. Paterson United States
G. Terreran United States
C. Rumsey United Kingdom
Matthew S. B. Coleman United States
Antonino Cucchiara United States
Debatri Chattopadhyay United Kingdom
B. Marcote Netherlands
D. A. Coulter
Citations per year, relative to D. A. Coulter D. A. Coulter (= 1×) peers B. Marcote

Countries citing papers authored by D. A. Coulter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. A. Coulter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. A. Coulter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. A. Coulter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. A. Coulter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. A. Coulter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. A. Coulter. The network helps show where D. A. Coulter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. A. Coulter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. A. Coulter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. A. Coulter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. A. Coulter. D. A. Coulter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Baldassare, Vivienne, D. O. Jones, K. Decker French, et al.. (2025). A Large-scale Search for Photometrically Variable Active Galactic Nuclei in Dwarf Galaxies Using the Young Supernova Experiment. The Astrophysical Journal. 985(2). 223–223. 1 indexed citations
2.
Akins, Hollis B., Caitlin M. Casey, Danielle A. Berg, et al.. (2025). Strong Rest-UV Emission Lines in a “Little Red Dot” Active Galactic Nucleus at z = 7: Early Supermassive Black Hole Growth alongside Compact Massive Star Formation?. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 980(2). L29–L29. 10 indexed citations
3.
Ridden-Harper, Ryan, A. Rest, Michele T. Bannister, et al.. (2025). TESSELLATE: Piecing Together the Variable Sky with TESS. The Astronomical Journal. 170(3). 186–186. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rest, A., C. D. Kilpatrick, J. Jencson, et al.. (2025). ATClean: A Novel Method for Detecting Low-luminosity Transients and Application to Pre-explosion Counterparts from SN 2023ixf. The Astrophysical Journal. 979(2). 114–114. 3 indexed citations
5.
Kilpatrick, C. D., R. J. Foley, W. V. Jacobson-Galán, et al.. (2023). SN 2023ixf in Messier 101: A Variable Red Supergiant as the Progenitor Candidate to a Type II Supernova. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 952(1). L23–L23. 50 indexed citations
6.
Kilpatrick, C. D., D. A. Coulter, R. J. Foley, et al.. (2022). Updated Photometry of the Yellow Supergiant Progenitor and Late-time Observations of the Type IIb Supernova SN 2016gkg. The Astrophysical Journal. 936(2). 111–111. 11 indexed citations
7.
Dettman, K., Saurabh W. Jha, Mi Dai, et al.. (2021). The Foundation Supernova Survey: Photospheric Velocity Correlations in Type Ia Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal. 923(2). 267–267. 10 indexed citations
8.
Heinzel, J., M. W. Coughlin, Tim Dietrich, et al.. (2021). Comparing inclination-dependent analyses of kilonova transients. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 502(2). 3057–3065. 37 indexed citations
9.
Jacobson-Galán, W. V., Abigail Polin, R. J. Foley, et al.. (2020). Ca hnk: The Calcium-rich Transient Supernova 2016hnk from a Helium Shell Detonation of a Sub-Chandrasekhar White Dwarf. The Astrophysical Journal. 896(2). 165–165. 15 indexed citations
10.
Law-Smith, Jamie A. P., D. A. Coulter, James Guillochon, Brenna Mockler, & E. Ramírez-Ruiz. (2020). Stellar Tidal Disruption Events with Abundances and Realistic Structures (STARS): Library of Fallback Rates. The Astrophysical Journal. 905(2). 141–141. 52 indexed citations
11.
Foley, R. J., D. A. Coulter, C. D. Kilpatrick, et al.. (2020). Updated parameter estimates for GW190425 using astrophysical arguments and implications for the electromagnetic counterpart. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 494(1). 190–198. 34 indexed citations
12.
Kilpatrick, C. D., D. A. Coulter, C. Rojas-Bravo, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190425z: Swope follow-up observations.. GRB Coordinates Network. 24212. 1.
13.
Coughlin, M. W., S. Antier, D. Corre, et al.. (2019). Optimizing multitelescope observations of gravitational-wave counterparts. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 489(4). 5775–5783. 23 indexed citations
14.
Jones, D. O., Adam G. Riess, D. Scolnic, et al.. (2018). Should Type Ia Supernova Distances Be Corrected for Their Local Environments?. The Astrophysical Journal. 867(2). 108–108. 65 indexed citations
15.
Kilpatrick, C. D., D. A. Coulter, G. Dimitriadis, et al.. (2018). X-ray limits on the progenitor system of the Type Ia supernova 2017ejb. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 481(3). 4123–4132. 7 indexed citations
16.
Coulter, D. A., C. D. Kilpatrick, M. R. Siebert, et al.. (2017). LIGO/Virgo G298048: Potential optical counterpart discovered by Swope telescope. GRB Coordinates Network. 21529. 1. 6 indexed citations
17.
Coulter, D. A., Bret Lehmer, Rafael T. Eufrasio, et al.. (2017). Testing the Universality of the Stellar IMF with Chandra and HST. The Astrophysical Journal. 835(2). 183–183. 6 indexed citations
18.
Drout, M. R., Joshua D. Simon, B. J. Shappee, et al.. (2017). LIGO/VIRGO G298048: Magellan Optical Spectrum of the Potential Optical Counterpart Associated with NGC 4993. GRB Coordinates Network. 21547. 1. 1 indexed citations
19.
Kilpatrick, C. D., R. J. Foley, M. R. Drout, et al.. (2017). Connecting the progenitors, pre-explosion variability and giant outbursts of luminous blue variables with Gaia16cfr. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 473(4). 4805–4823. 26 indexed citations
20.
Coulter, D. A., et al.. (2012). Active Optics for Low-Cost Astronomical Space Telescopes. AAS. 219. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026