Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System
2018518 citationsJ. Tonry, L. Denneau et al.profile →
IMPROVED DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM ∼100 NEW CfA SUPERNOVA TYPE Ia LIGHT CURVES
2009503 citationsSaurabh W. Jha, Patrick L. Kelly et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Rest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Rest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Rest more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Rest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Rest. The network helps show where A. Rest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Rest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Rest.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Rest based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Rest. A. Rest is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kilpatrick, C. D., D. A. Coulter, C. Rojas-Bravo, et al.. (2019). LIGO/Virgo S190425z: Swope follow-up observations.. GRB Coordinates Network. 24212. 1.
10.
Graham, M. L., A. Rest, J. C. Wheeler, et al.. (2019). Discovery Frontiers of Explosive Transients: An ELT and LSST Perspective. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(3). 339.1 indexed citations
11.
Smartt, S. J., O. Mcbrien, K. W. Smith, et al.. (2019). ATLAS19mbg (AT2019gsc): discovery of an unusual faint blue transient in SBS 1436+529A (53 Mpc). 23. 1.1 indexed citations
Coulter, D. A., C. D. Kilpatrick, M. R. Siebert, et al.. (2017). LIGO/Virgo G298048: Potential optical counterpart discovered by Swope telescope. GRB Coordinates Network. 21529. 1.6 indexed citations
14.
Chambers, K. C., H. Flewelling, M. Willman, et al.. (2015). The Pan-STARRS Survey for Transients (PSST) - first announcement and public release. ATel. 7153. 1.3 indexed citations
Saha, Abhijit, T. S. Axelrod, C. W. Stubbs, et al.. (2012). Establishing a Network of DA White Dwarf SED Standards. 12967.
17.
Jedicke, Robert, J. Tonry, Peter Vereš, et al.. (2012). ATLAS: Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System. 44.5 indexed citations
18.
Berger, E., Kathy Roth, Alicia Soderberg, et al.. (2011). Exotic Explosions and Eruptions: Exploring a New Transient Phase-Space with Pan-STARRS. 164.1 indexed citations
19.
Widenhorn, Ralf, Morley M. Blouke, A. Weber, A. Rest, & Erik Bodegom. (2002). <title>Temperature dependence of dark current in a CCD</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4669. 193–201.70 indexed citations
20.
Stubbs, C. W., Kem H. Cook, Suzanne L. Hawley, et al.. (2001). A Next Generation Microlensing Survey of the LMC. 37.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.