R. Keßler

27.2k total citations
50 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

R. Keßler is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Keßler has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 5 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in R. Keßler's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (34 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (16 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (14 papers). R. Keßler is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (34 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (16 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (14 papers). R. Keßler collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. R. Keßler's co-authors include D. Scolnic, M. Šako, J. Marriner, R. C. Nichol, Donald P. Schneider, M. Smith, J. Frieman, Saurabh W. Jha, Dillon Brout and Bruce A. Bassett and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

R. Keßler

44 papers receiving 987 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Keßler United States 17 875 420 162 58 19 50 1.0k
J. González-Nuevo Spain 17 824 0.9× 358 0.9× 154 1.0× 42 0.7× 22 1.2× 65 873
S. T. Myers United States 16 1.1k 1.3× 530 1.3× 155 1.0× 70 1.2× 18 0.9× 40 1.2k
R. Miquel Spain 14 548 0.6× 407 1.0× 120 0.7× 57 1.0× 27 1.4× 55 815
C. Horellou Sweden 20 887 1.0× 405 1.0× 149 0.9× 41 0.7× 12 0.6× 62 943
P. Astier France 16 952 1.1× 468 1.1× 113 0.7× 51 0.9× 52 2.7× 42 1.0k
Ákos Bogdán United States 16 958 1.1× 309 0.7× 213 1.3× 29 0.5× 13 0.7× 52 1.0k
Chao‐Wei Tsai China 19 1.4k 1.6× 284 0.7× 499 3.1× 45 0.8× 18 0.9× 74 1.4k
O. Wucknitz Germany 18 710 0.8× 233 0.6× 96 0.6× 86 1.5× 11 0.6× 45 746
M. Hicken United States 13 1.2k 1.4× 497 1.2× 136 0.8× 35 0.6× 19 1.0× 14 1.3k
N. Ben Bekhti Germany 14 1.3k 1.5× 444 1.1× 83 0.5× 27 0.5× 11 0.6× 22 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by R. Keßler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Keßler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Keßler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Keßler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Keßler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Keßler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Keßler. The network helps show where R. Keßler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Keßler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Keßler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Keßler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Keßler. R. Keßler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rose, Benjamin, M. Vincenzi, Rebekah Hounsell, et al.. (2025). The Hourglass Simulation: A Catalog for the Roman High-latitude Time-domain Core Community Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. 988(1). 65–65. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lee, J, M. Šako, R. Keßler, & Alex I. Malz. (2024). Astrometric Redshifts of Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal. 977(2). 199–199.
3.
Popovic, B, D. Scolnic, M. Vincenzi, et al.. (2024). Amalgame: cosmological constraints from the first combined photometric supernova sample. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 529(3). 2100–2115.
4.
Taylor, G., D. O. Jones, B Popovic, et al.. (2023). SALT2 versus SALT3: updated model surfaces and their impacts on type Ia supernova cosmology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(4). 5209–5224. 9 indexed citations
5.
Peiris, Hiranya V., et al.. (2023). Impact of Rubin Observatory Cadence Choices on Supernovae Photometric Classification. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 265(2). 43–43. 3 indexed citations
6.
Lokken, Martine, Alexander Gagliano, Gautham Narayan, et al.. (2023). The simulated catalogue of optical transients and correlated hosts (SCOTCH). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 520(2). 2887–2912. 10 indexed citations
7.
Keßler, R., M. Vincenzi, & P. Armstrong. (2023). Binning is Sinning: Redemption for Hubble Diagram Using Photometrically Classified Type Ia Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 952(1). L8–L8. 3 indexed citations
8.
Dai, Mi, D. O. Jones, W. D. Kenworthy, et al.. (2023). Propagating Uncertainties in the SALT3 Model-training Process to Cosmological Constraints. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 267(1). 1–1. 1 indexed citations
9.
Armstrong, P., Helen Qu, Dillon Brout, et al.. (2023). Probing the consistency of cosmological contours for supernova cosmology. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia. 40. 1 indexed citations
10.
Jones, D. O., W. D. Kenworthy, Mi Dai, et al.. (2023). A Spectroscopic Model of the Type Ia Supernova–Host-galaxy Mass Correlation from SALT3. The Astrophysical Journal. 951(1). 22–22. 5 indexed citations
11.
Joshi, Bhavin, Louis-Gregory Strolger, Russell E. Ryan, et al.. (2022). High-precision Redshifts for Type Ia Supernovae with the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope P127 Prism. The Astrophysical Journal. 941(2). 146–146. 4 indexed citations
12.
Kenworthy, W. D., D. O. Jones, Mi Dai, et al.. (2021). SALT3: An Improved Type Ia Supernova Model for Measuring Cosmic Distances. The Astrophysical Journal. 923(2). 265–265. 56 indexed citations
13.
Hounsell, Rebekah, D. Scolnic, R. J. Foley, et al.. (2018). Simulations of the WFIRST Supernova Survey and Forecasts of Cosmological Constraints. The Astrophysical Journal. 867(1). 23–23. 99 indexed citations
14.
Nicholl, M., César Briceño, P. S. Cowperthwaite, et al.. (2017). LIGO/Virgo G298048: Possible features in the spectrum of GW counterpart SSS17a. GRB Coordinates Network. 21585. 1. 1 indexed citations
15.
Betoule, M., J. Guy, R. Keßler, et al.. (2014). Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SNLS and SDSS surveys. 223.
16.
Long, Min, G. C. Jordan, Daniel R. van Rossum, et al.. (2014). THREE-DIMENSIONAL SIMULATIONS OF PURE DEFLAGRATION MODELS FOR THERMONUCLEAR SUPERNOVAE. The Astrophysical Journal. 789(2). 103–103. 22 indexed citations
17.
Betoule, M., J. Marriner, N. Regnault, et al.. (2012). Improved photometric calibration of the SNLS and the SDSS supernova surveys. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 552. A124–A124. 55 indexed citations
18.
D’Andrea, C. B., R. Gupta, M. Šako, et al.. (2011). Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town). 26 indexed citations
19.
Stokes, Jeffrey R., R. Keßler, George Philip, & Thomas B. Casale. (2005). Ragweed skin test responsiveness correlates with specific immunoglobulin E levels.. PubMed. 26(2). 103–7. 1 indexed citations
20.
Mayer, B., A. Boudard, B. Fabbro, et al.. (1996). Reactionspd→3He η andpd→3Heπ+π−near the η threshold. Physical Review C. 53(5). 2068–2074. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. González-Nuevo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. T. Myers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Miquel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Horellou Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Astier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ákos Bogdán Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chao‐Wei Tsai Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by O. Wucknitz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Hicken Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. Ben Bekhti
Rankless by CCL
2026