Priska Breves
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Marketing top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Nicole LiebersHolger SchrammJan‐Philipp SteinAnnika KunzeAnna HeidenreichLars KönigZeph M. C. van BerloAlice Binder
- Topics
- Media Influence and Health (20 papers)Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsAustria
In The Last Decade
Priska Breves
29 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Sociology and Political Science 771
- Marketing 373
- Literature and Literary Theory 370
- Human-Computer Interaction 223
- Gender Studies 128
Countries citing papers authored by Priska Breves
This map shows the geographic impact of Priska Breves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Priska Breves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Priska Breves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Priska Breves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Priska Breves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Priska Breves. The network helps show where Priska Breves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Priska Breves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Priska Breves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Priska Breves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Priska Breves. Priska Breves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | Parasocial interactions with real and virtual influencers: The role of perceived similarity and human-likenessbreakdown → | 175 |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 105 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | The Perceived Fit between Instagram Influencers and the Endorsed Brandbreakdown → | 318 |
| 20 | 23 |
About Priska Breves
Priska Breves is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Human-Computer Interaction and Marketing, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (20 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (373 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (223 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (370 citations). Priska Breves has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Nicole Liebers, Holger Schramm, Jan‐Philipp Stein, Annika Kunze, Anna Heidenreich, Lars König, Zeph M. C. van Berlo, Alice Binder, Marijn H. C. Meijers and Ralf Suhr. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, New Media & Society and Human Communication Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.