Philip Thacker

1.5k citations
42 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 19

Philip Thacker

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Philip Thacker
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Animal Science and Zoology 560
  • Microbiology 183
  • Small Animals 147
  • Aquatic Science 136
  • Food Science 245
Replace Yeong-Hsiang Cheng with:
Yeong-Hsiang Cheng Taiwan
I.K. Kwon South Korea
Elizabeth Santín Brazil
M. R. Reddy India
Muhammad Shahid China
Hongbo Yi China
A.P. McElroy United States
B. A. Rotter Canada
K. Ghareeb Austria
Philip Thacker relative to Yeong-Hsiang Cheng Taiwan Yeong-Hsiang Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Yeong-Hsiang Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Thacker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Thacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Thacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Thacker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Thacker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Thacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Thacker. The network helps show where Philip Thacker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Thacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Thacker Line = papers co-authored together Philip Thacker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20167
2 201625
3 201539
4 201538
5 201418
6 2013128
7 20139
8 20131
9 2013223
10 20136
11 201222
12 2012143
13 201250
14 20122
15 201117
16
Influence of Enzyme and/or Lysolecithin Supplementation on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Egg Quality for Laying Hens
201010
17 201020
18 200029
19
Induced estrus and breeding during lactation: Effects on sow and litter performance
19983
20
The influence of original breeding weight and estrus of mating on the productivity of sows over four parities.
19897

About Philip Thacker

Philip Thacker is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Small Animals, Equine and Microbiology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (23 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (8 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers), Moringa oleifera research and applications (4 papers) and Phytase and its Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (560 citations), Microbiology (183 citations), Small Animals (147 citations), Aquatic Science (136 citations) and Food Science (245 citations). Philip Thacker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include G.P. Widyaratne, Shiyan Qiao, Xiangfang Zeng, Shihai Zhang, Zhimin Huang, Xi Ma, C. Xie, Guoyao Wu, Shiyan Qiao and Fengrui Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Archives of Animal Nutrition, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology and Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026