Countries where authors publish in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences.
About Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
The 6.1k papers published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 93.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences usually cover Animal Science and Zoology (2.4k papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (2.0k papers) and Genetics (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1.6k papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (1.3k papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences are Metha Wanapat, In Ho Kim, C. Wenk, In K. Han, J. K. Ha, J.A. Lucey, Xiangshu Piao, B. J. Chae, R. Mosenthin and Changsu Kong.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.