Philip Tew
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Papers in
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 11
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 3
- Modernist Literature and Criticism 2
- Themes in Literature Analysis 2
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 3
- Data Visualization and Analytics 2
- Co-authors
- Elaine Showalter (1 shared paper)David R. Glowacki (5 shared papers)Rod Mengham (2 shared papers)Richard Lane (1 shared paper)Michael B. O’Connor (2 shared papers)Anne Roudaut (1 shared paper)Oussama Metatla (1 shared paper)P. J. Bates (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Changing English (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Critical Survey (1 paper)Leonardo (1 paper)The Review of English Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Tew
20 papers receiving 231 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Human-Computer Interaction 39
- Literature and Literary Theory 76
- Biophysics 18
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 10
- Structural Biology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Tew
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Tew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Tew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Tew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Tew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Tew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Tew. The network helps show where Philip Tew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Tew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 96 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 36 | |
| 3 | Contemporary British fiction | 2003 | 24 |
| 4 | The Contemporary British Novel | 2004 | 23 |
| 5 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 12 | B.S. Johnson: A Critical Reading | 2001 | 5 |
| 13 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 14 | Coming of age | 2011 | 3 |
| 15 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 1 |
About Philip Tew
Philip Tew is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 26 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (11 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (3 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers) and Signaling Pathways in Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (39 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (76 citations), Biophysics (18 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (10 citations) and Structural Biology (3 citations). Philip Tew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Elaine Showalter, David R. Glowacki, Rod Mengham, Richard Lane, Michael B. O’Connor, Anne Roudaut, Oussama Metatla, P. J. Bates, Adrian J. Mulholland and Helen M. Deeks. Their work appears in journals such as Changing English, The Modern Language Review, Critical Survey, Leonardo and The Review of English Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.