Richard Lane
- Geophysics top 5%
- Ocean Engineering top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Environmental Engineering
- Co-authors
- Andrew R. GreenDaniel SattelRod MenghamPhilip TewJinsong DuVincent LesurRoss BrodiePaul C. McDonald
- Topics
- Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (26 papers)Geophysical Methods and Applications (9 papers)Seismic Waves and Analysis (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Richard Lane
43 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Geophysics 314
- Ocean Engineering 192
- Artificial Intelligence 93
- Oceanography 82
- Environmental Engineering 53
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Lane
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Lane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Lane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Lane. The network helps show where Richard Lane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Lane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Lane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Lane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Lane. Richard Lane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Three dimensional lithospheric magnetization structures beneath Australia derived by inverse modeling of CHAMP satellite magnetic field model | 2 |
| 4 | Global literary theory : an anthology | 14 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | The changing face of the US SEC's enforcement investigations (AAERS) into financial statement fraud in the post-enron environment | 1 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop | 8 |
| 13 | Contemporary British fiction | 24 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Richard Lane
Richard Lane is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology and Geology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (26 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (9 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (314 citations), Ocean Engineering (192 citations) and Oceanography (82 citations). Richard Lane has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew R. Green, Daniel Sattel, Rod Mengham, Philip Tew, Jinsong Du, Vincent Lesur, Ross Brodie, Paul C. McDonald, Chao Chen and Huilin Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Geophysical Journal International, Exploration Geophysics and Accounting Research Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.