Helen M. Deeks

7 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Helen M. Deeks
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Human-Computer Interaction 93
  • Biophysics 35
  • Information Systems and Management 30
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 73
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 12
Replace Michael B. O’Connor with:
Michael B. O’Connor United Kingdom
Abbe Don United States
Alex Tek France
Ramya Srinivasan United States
Jung‐Ying Wang Taiwan
Ilia Ovsiannikov United States
Jeff Dyck Canada
Markus Vogel Germany
Christopher Keller United States
Lucien F. Krapp Switzerland
Helen M. Deeks relative to Michael B. O’Connor United Kingdom Michael B. O’Connor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Michael B. O’Connor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen M. Deeks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen M. Deeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen M. Deeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen M. Deeks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen M. Deeks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen M. Deeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen M. Deeks. The network helps show where Helen M. Deeks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Helen M. Deeks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen M. Deeks Line = papers co-authored together Helen M. Deeks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 201896
2 201991
3
201974
4 202037
5 202029
6 202112
7 20236

About Helen M. Deeks

Helen M. Deeks is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (2 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (93 citations), Biophysics (35 citations), Information Systems and Management (30 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (73 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (12 citations). Helen M. Deeks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Adrian J. Mulholland, David R. Glowacki, Michael B. O’Connor, Simon J. Bennie, Kara E. Ranaghan, Robin J. Shannon, Jonathan Barnoud, P. J. Bates, Philip Tew and Thomas J. Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as Science Advances, Scientific Reports, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact