Philip M. Reaper
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Oncology top 1%
- Physiology top 1%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephen P. JacksonFabrizio d’Adda di FagagnaGabriele SaretzkiNigel P. CarterThomas von ZglinickiHeike FieglerPhilippa CarrJohn R. Pollard
- Topics
- DNA Repair Mechanisms (15 papers)Cell death mechanisms and regulation (8 papers)Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (7 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingOncologyPhysiology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Reaper
19 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Molecular Biology 4.2k
- Oncology 2.0k
- Physiology 1.7k
- Cancer Research 721
- Cell Biology 391
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Reaper
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Reaper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Reaper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Reaper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Reaper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Reaper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Reaper. The network helps show where Philip M. Reaper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Reaper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Reaper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Reaper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Reaper. Philip M. Reaper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 270 | |
| 5 | 112 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 121 | |
| 9 | 149 | |
| 10 | 191 | |
| 11 | 127 | |
| 12 | 278 | |
| 13 | 476 | |
| 14 | 192 | |
| 15 | 151 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | Identification and Characterization of a Novel and Specific Inhibitor of the Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase ATMbreakdown → | 983 |
| 19 | A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescencebreakdown → | 2124 |
About Philip M. Reaper
Philip M. Reaper is a scholar working on Aging, Oncology and Toxicology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (15 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (8 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (323 citations), Oncology (2.0k citations) and Physiology (1.7k citations). Philip M. Reaper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Jackson, Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna, Gabriele Saretzki, Nigel P. Carter, Thomas von Zglinicki, Heike Fiegler, Philippa Carr, John R. Pollard, Peter Charlton and Nicola J. Curtin. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.