M.K. Swan

1.1k citations
19 papers · 866 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • DNA Repair Mechanisms 5
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 3
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
    • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology 7

M.K. Swan

19 papers receiving 861 citations

Peers

M.K. Swan
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cell Biology 172
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Molecular Biology 592
  • Cancer Research 83
  • Molecular Medicine 21
Replace Jukka Häyrinen with:
Jukka Häyrinen Finland
Xiangxiang Zhang China
Takashi Tadokoro Japan
Emiel Michiels Belgium
Xiong Liu China
Zijian Zhang China
Mizuki Takemoto Japan
Andrew C. Paoletti United States
J. Rajan Prabu Germany
Andrei Kucharavy United States
M.K. Swan relative to Jukka Häyrinen Finland Jukka Häyrinen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jukka Häyrinen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.K. Swan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.K. Swan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.K. Swan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.K. Swan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.K. Swan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.K. Swan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.K. Swan. The network helps show where M.K. Swan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M.K. Swan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.K. Swan Line = papers co-authored together M.K. Swan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009207
2 201494
3 201781
4 201475
5 200965
6 201458
7 200951
8 200439
9 200336
10 201730
11 200628
12 200426
13 202224
14 200421
15 201513
16 200510
17 20034
18 20043
19 20231

About M.K. Swan

M.K. Swan is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Surgery, Materials Chemistry and Plant Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 866 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (7 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (5 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (5 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (172 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Molecular Biology (592 citations), Cancer Research (83 citations) and Molecular Medicine (21 citations). M.K. Swan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Johnson, Aneel K. Aggarwal, Louise Prakash, Satya Prakash, Eric Wieschaus, Thomas Hansen, Peter Schönheit, Christopher Davies, Konstantin Doubrovinski and Joshua W. Shaevitz. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Molecular Biology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE and ChemBioChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact