Philip K. Berger
- Sociology and Political Science
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Gender Studies top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Richard L. OliverLinda A. KreftingMarc J. WallaceR. LeemansJ. S. de GraafOliver StaadtKeith AndrewsTobias Schreck
- Topics
- Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers)Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers)Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip K. Berger
29 papers receiving 345 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Sociology and Political Science 81
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 62
- Epidemiology 61
- Gender Studies 59
- General Health Professions 43
Countries citing papers authored by Philip K. Berger
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip K. Berger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip K. Berger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip K. Berger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip K. Berger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip K. Berger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip K. Berger. The network helps show where Philip K. Berger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip K. Berger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip K. Berger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip K. Berger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip K. Berger. Philip K. Berger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | Refugee health: Providing the best possible care in the face of crippling cuts. | 4 |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | Survey of training, handling practices, and risk perceptions of Kentucky pharmacists working with antineoplastic agents. | 1 |
| 13 | Research and evaluation methods for measuring nonroutine mine health and safety skills : bibliography | 2 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | Testing Competing Models of Consumer Decision Making in the Preventive Health Care Marketplace | 2 |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Philip K. Berger
Philip K. Berger is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Applied Psychology and Anatomy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia detection and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (42 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations) and General Decision Sciences (10 citations). Philip K. Berger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Oliver, Linda A. Krefting, Marc J. Wallace, R. Leemans, J. S. de Graaf, Oliver Staadt, Keith Andrews, Tobias Schreck, Jürgen Bernard and Alexei Sourin. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Consumer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.