Philip C. Kendall

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 805 citations indexed

About

Philip C. Kendall is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip C. Kendall has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 805 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip C. Kendall's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Philip C. Kendall is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Philip C. Kendall collaborates with scholars based in United States. Philip C. Kendall's co-authors include Nicole E. Caporino, Colleen M. Cummings, Meghan M. Smith, Michael A. Southam‐Gerow, John R. Weisz, Bryce D. McLeod, Scott N. Compton, Tara S. Peris, Anna J. Swan and Boris Birmaher and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Philip C. Kendall

5 papers receiving 783 citations

Hit Papers

Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and ado... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip C. Kendall United States 4 590 321 178 163 105 6 805
Lauren D. Gulley United States 11 549 0.9× 265 0.8× 165 0.9× 130 0.8× 65 0.6× 25 765
Faith Orchard United Kingdom 17 497 0.8× 483 1.5× 133 0.7× 153 0.9× 213 2.0× 33 909
Alexandra M. Rodman United States 17 726 1.2× 247 0.8× 186 1.0× 108 0.7× 178 1.7× 27 1.1k
Leslie Rith‐Najarian United States 11 614 1.0× 237 0.7× 171 1.0× 133 0.8× 61 0.6× 21 799
Mona Yaptangco United States 8 673 1.1× 207 0.6× 200 1.1× 80 0.5× 60 0.6× 12 901
Sucheta D. Connolly United States 11 563 1.0× 266 0.8× 83 0.5× 135 0.8× 123 1.2× 15 743
R. Meredith Elkins United States 15 589 1.0× 179 0.6× 129 0.7× 141 0.9× 129 1.2× 25 843
Cara A. Settipani United States 15 551 0.9× 211 0.7× 177 1.0× 142 0.9× 178 1.7× 17 845
Caroline E. Kerns United States 14 841 1.4× 310 1.0× 252 1.4× 133 0.8× 138 1.3× 20 1.1k
Elise Sloan Australia 7 585 1.0× 321 1.0× 160 0.9× 71 0.4× 103 1.0× 10 795

Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Kendall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Kendall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Kendall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Kendall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Kendall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Kendall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Kendall. The network helps show where Philip C. Kendall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Kendall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Kendall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Kendall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Kendall. Philip C. Kendall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
1.
McNeil, Galen D., Ruben G. Martinez, John Piacentini, et al.. (2025). Characteristics and Predictors of Patient and Parent Satisfaction in the Treatment of Youth Anxiety Disorders. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 35(10). 563–572.
2.
Kendall, Philip C., et al.. (2024). Trends, advances and directions in cognitive‐behavioral therapy for adolescent anxiety. World Psychiatry. 23(3). 442–443. 2 indexed citations
3.
Swan, Anna J., Philip C. Kendall, Thomas M. Olino, et al.. (2018). Results from the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Longitudinal Study (CAMELS): Functional outcomes.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 86(9). 738–750. 34 indexed citations
4.
McLeod, Bryce D., Meghan M. Smith, Michael A. Southam‐Gerow, John R. Weisz, & Philip C. Kendall. (2014). Measuring treatment differentiation for implementation research: The Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy Revised Strategies Scale.. Psychological Assessment. 27(1). 314–325. 39 indexed citations
5.
Cummings, Colleen M., Nicole E. Caporino, & Philip C. Kendall. (2013). Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: 20 years after.. Psychological Bulletin. 140(3). 816–845. 706 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Kendall, Philip C., et al.. (1991). Psychological and pharmacological therapy: Methods and modes for comparative outcome research.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 59(1). 78–87. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026