Galen D. McNeil
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Dacher KeltnerJennifer E. StellarAmie M. GordonCraig L. AndersonD LoewYang BaiKaiping PengSerena Chen
- Topics
- Media Influence and Health (5 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSouth Sudan
In The Last Decade
Galen D. McNeil
10 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Literature and Literary Theory 560
- Sociology and Political Science 398
- Social Psychology 381
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 186
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
Countries citing papers authored by Galen D. McNeil
This map shows the geographic impact of Galen D. McNeil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Galen D. McNeil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Galen D. McNeil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Galen D. McNeil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Galen D. McNeil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Galen D. McNeil. The network helps show where Galen D. McNeil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Galen D. McNeil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Galen D. McNeil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Galen D. McNeil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Galen D. McNeil. Galen D. McNeil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self.breakdown → | 265 |
| 8 | 158 | |
| 9 | 192 | |
| 10 | The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe.breakdown → | 245 |
| 11 | 190 |
About Galen D. McNeil
Galen D. McNeil is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (560 citations), Applied Psychology (122 citations) and Social Psychology (381 citations). Galen D. McNeil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Dacher Keltner, Jennifer E. Stellar, Amie M. Gordon, Craig L. Anderson, D Loew, Yang Bai, Kaiping Peng, Serena Chen, Laura A. Maruskin and Neha A. John‐Henderson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Emotion and Behavior Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.