Philip Brett

750 citations
32 papers · 180 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Music top 1%
    • Music History and Culture
    • Musicology and Musical Analysis
    • Theater, Performance, and Music History
    • Diverse Music Education Insights
    • Diverse Musicological Studies

Papers in

    • Musicology and Musical Analysis 9
    • Music History and Culture 5
    • Diverse Musicological Studies 4
    • Theater, Performance, and Music History 2
    • Historical Studies of British Isles 4

Philip Brett

18 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Philip Brett
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Music 86
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
  • Gender Studies 28
  • Museology 9
  • History 26
Replace Hugh Shields with:
Hugh Shields Ireland
Dominique-René de Lerma
Alisa Solomon United States
James A. Snead
Harold B. Segel United States
Stephen M. Archer
Thomas Postlewait United States
Hermano Vianna Brazil
David Román United States
Lindon Barrett United States
Philip Brett relative to Hugh Shields Ireland Hugh Shields's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Hugh Shields · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Brett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Brett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Brett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Brett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Brett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Brett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Brett. The network helps show where Philip Brett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Philip Brett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Brett Line = papers co-authored together Philip Brett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20071
2 20066
3
Decomposition: Post-Disciplinary Performance
20002
4 19972
5 199711
6 19961
7 19959
8 199435
9 19930
10 19821
11 19812
12 19800
13 19771
14
Madrigals, songs and canons
19761
15 19724
16 19712
17
Consort songs : for voice and viols
19703
18 19675
19 19613
20
Songs by William Byrd in manuscripts at Harvard
19603

About Philip Brett

Philip Brett is a scholar working on Music, History, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cultural Studies and Archeology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (9 papers), Music History and Culture (5 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (4 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (4 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (1 paper) and Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (86 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations), Gender Studies (28 citations), Museology (9 citations) and History (26 citations). Philip Brett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan Leigh Foster, Sue‐Ellen Case, Elizabeth Wood, William Byrd, George E. Haggerty, Thurston Dart, Mary Ann Smart, Joseph Kerman, Paul Banks and Phil Reed. Their work appears in journals such as Notes, Music and Letters, 19th-Century Music, Early Music and The Musical Times.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026