Phil Reed

6.9k citations
300 papers · 5.0k indexed · h-index 33

Phil Reed

282 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Phil Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 3.0k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.6k
  • Clinical Psychology 2.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
  • Applied Psychology 214
Replace Bhismadev Chakrabarti with:
Bhismadev Chakrabarti United Kingdom
Jennifer H. Pfeifer United States
Qi Dong China
Coralie Chevallier France
Chris Ashwin United Kingdom
Gaia Scerif United Kingdom
Joseph J. Campos United States
Daniel N. McIntosh United States
Murray T. Maybery Australia
Martin A. Conway United Kingdom
Phil Reed relative to Bhismadev Chakrabarti United Kingdom Bhismadev Chakrabarti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Bhismadev Chakrabarti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phil Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Reed. The network helps show where Phil Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phil Reed Line = papers co-authored together Phil Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20240
4 20240
5 20231
6 20226
7 20213
8 201937
9 201917
10 20176
11 20177
12 20163
13 201520
14 20124
15
Development of an operant procedure for content word dysfluencies in persistent stuttering children: Initial experimental data.
20072
16 200421
17
Stimulus overselectivity and early behavioural intervention for autism
20022
18
Operant procedures that increase function word repetition used with children whose speech had not improved during previous treatment
20014
19 19994
20 199215

About Phil Reed

Phil Reed is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences, having authored 300 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (120 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (95 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (37 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (34 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (32 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (32 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (25 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (3.0k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.6k citations) and Clinical Psychology (2.0k citations). Phil Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lisa A. Osborne, Louise McHugh, Jo Saunders, R. Truzoli, Michela Romano, Paul Bakan, Elias Tsakanikos, Todd R. Schachtman, Geoffrey Hall and Theresa A. Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Motivation, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Learning & Behavior, Research in autism spectrum disorders and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026