Thomas Postlewait
Impact in
- Music top 2%
- Theater, Performance, and Music History
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies
Papers in
- Music 6
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 6
-
- Theatre and Performance Studies 8
- Co-authors
- James ParadisRosemarie K. BankBruce McConachieTracy C. DavisWilliam ShakespeareDaniel J. WatermeierBrooks McNamaraW. M. Kliewer
- Journals
- Theatre Journal (5 papers)Theatre Survey (3 papers)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Theatre Research International (1 paper)Twentieth Century Literature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Postlewait
15 papers receiving 81 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Music 51
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 70
- Literature and Literary Theory 65
- History and Philosophy of Science 16
- Museology 10
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Postlewait
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Postlewait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Postlewait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Postlewait more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Postlewait
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Postlewait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Postlewait. The network helps show where Thomas Postlewait may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Postlewait, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 3 | The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Historiography | 2009 | 25 |
| 4 | Theatricality: An Introduction | 2008 | 12 |
| 5 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 47 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 14 | Victorian science and Victorian values | 1981 | 5 |
| 15 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 16 | Victorian science and Victorian values: literary perspectives. | 1981 | 32 |
| 17 | 1981 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 6 |
About Thomas Postlewait
Thomas Postlewait is a scholar working on Music, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 18 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (8 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (6 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (2 papers), Literature Analysis and Criticism (1 paper), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (1 paper), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper) and Samuel Beckett and Modernism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (51 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (70 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (65 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations) and Museology (10 citations). Thomas Postlewait has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Paradis, Rosemarie K. Bank, Bruce McConachie, Tracy C. Davis, William Shakespeare, Daniel J. Watermeier, Brooks McNamara, W. M. Kliewer, Christopher Bigsby and Don B. Wilmeth. Their work appears in journals such as Theatre Journal, Theatre Survey, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Theatre Research International and Twentieth Century Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.