Thurston Dart
Impact in
- Music top 5%
- Musicology and Musical Analysis
- Music History and Culture
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Papers in
- Music 11
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 10
- Diverse Musicological Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Ian BentPhilip BrettJan LaRueGilles ChâtellierJohn BullFrank ZimmermanNicolas MartelliPatrice Prognon
- Journals
- Music and Letters (10 papers)Notes (2 papers)The Musical Times (4 papers)Revue de musicologie (1 paper)Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaFrance
In The Last Decade
Thurston Dart
17 papers receiving 143 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Music 44
- Language and Linguistics 44
- Classics 14
- General Decision Sciences 7
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Thurston Dart
This map shows the geographic impact of Thurston Dart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thurston Dart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thurston Dart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thurston Dart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thurston Dart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thurston Dart. The network helps show where Thurston Dart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Thurston Dart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 2 | Fantazias and miscellaneous instrumental music | 1990 | 1 |
| 3 | Source materials and the interpretation of music : a memorial volume to Thurston Dart | 1981 | 11 |
| 4 | Les deux livres de clavecin | 1969 | 0 |
| 5 | 1967 | 0 | |
| 6 | The first book of ayres (1597, 1600, 1603, 1606, 1613) | 1965 | 1 |
| 7 | 1964 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 2 | |
| 10 | Songs by William Byrd in manuscripts at Harvard | 1960 | 3 |
| 11 | The English lute-songs | 1959 | 0 |
| 12 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1956 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1955 | 0 | |
| 17 | The Interpretation of Music | 1955 | 173 |
| 18 | 1954 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1953 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1952 | 4 |
About Thurston Dart
Thurston Dart is a scholar working on Music, General Arts and Humanities, History, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 40 papers that have together received 228 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (10 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (3 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), Historical Studies of British Isles (1 paper), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper), African history and culture analysis (1 paper) and Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (44 citations), Language and Linguistics (44 citations), Classics (14 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 citations). Thurston Dart has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and France. Frequent co-authors include Ian Bent, Philip Brett, Jan LaRue, Gilles Châtellier, John Bull, Frank Zimmerman, Nicolas Martelli, Patrice Prognon, Philip Sidney and William Byrd. Their work appears in journals such as Music and Letters, Notes, The Musical Times, Revue de musicologie and Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.