Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter White more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter White. The network helps show where Peter White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter White.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter White based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter White. Peter White is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moffat, David & Peter White. (2010). Potential role of time savings through teleworking. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster).1 indexed citations
2.
White, Peter, et al.. (2003). Use of public transport smart card data for understanding travel behaviour.6 indexed citations
3.
White, Peter, et al.. (2002). Experience of National Railways Privatisation, and of Vertical Separation in Metro Systems. OpenstarTs (Univeristy of Trieste https://www.units.it/).2 indexed citations
4.
White, Peter. (2001). PUBLIC TRANSPORT: ITS PLANNING, MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION - 4TH EDITION.. WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster). 4(3).6 indexed citations
5.
White, Peter, et al.. (2000). TRAVELLERS INFORMATION IN A REGIONAL CONTEXT: INFORMATION - THE FINAL FRONTIER?. 49(6).1 indexed citations
White, Peter, et al.. (1990). OPERATIONAL ASPECTS OF MINIBUS SERVICES. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
10.
White, Peter, et al.. (1990). THE SCOPE FOR RIDERSHIP GROWTH ON MINIBUSES: RESULTS OF PASSENGER SURVEYS.3 indexed citations
11.
White, Peter, et al.. (1990). URBAN MINIBUSES IN BRITAIN: DEVELOPMENT, USER RESPONSES, OPERATIONS AND FINANCES. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).11 indexed citations
12.
White, Peter. (1990). TRANSPORT PLANNING FOR THIRD WORLD CITIES. CHAPTER 3. INADEQUACIES OF URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMS.1 indexed citations
13.
White, Peter, et al.. (1987). DEVELOPMENT OF INTENSIVE URBAN MINIBUS SERVICES IN BRITAIN. Logistics and transportation review. 23(4).5 indexed citations
14.
White, Peter, et al.. (1987). NBC'S URBAN MINIBUSES: A REVIEW AND FINANCIAL APPRAISAL. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).5 indexed citations
15.
White, Peter, et al.. (1986). Recent UK Experience of the Influence of Regulation on Performance.1 indexed citations
16.
White, Peter. (1983). EXPRESS COACH SERVICES IN BRITAIN SINCE DEREGULATION.4 indexed citations
17.
White, Peter, et al.. (1982). THE EFFICIENCY OF BRITISH URBAN BUS OPERATORS. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 58(4). 896; author reply 896–8.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.