Jelena Ristic
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Co-authors
- Alan KingstoneChris Kelland FriesenFrancesca CapozziAlissa WrightJohn D. EastwoodDaniel SmilekJacob A. BurackLaurent Mottron
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (46 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (30 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jelena Ristic
63 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 550
- Social Psychology 458
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 354
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 158
Countries citing papers authored by Jelena Ristic
This map shows the geographic impact of Jelena Ristic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jelena Ristic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jelena Ristic more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jelena Ristic
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jelena Ristic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jelena Ristic. The network helps show where Jelena Ristic may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jelena Ristic
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jelena Ristic. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jelena Ristic based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jelena Ristic. Jelena Ristic is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 104 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 47 | |
| 20 | 93 |
About Jelena Ristic
Jelena Ristic is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (46 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (30 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (550 citations) and Sensory Systems (139 citations). Jelena Ristic has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alan Kingstone, Chris Kelland Friesen, Francesca Capozzi, Alissa Wright, John D. Eastwood, Daniel Smilek, Jacob A. Burack, Laurent Mottron, Grace Iarocci and Elton T.C. Ngan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.